Now this is a merger: NZ mulls mega-fund

The New Zealand government could create a single NZ$40 billion ($30 billion) fund under a proposal mooted in its inaugural ‘Investment Statement’ published this month.

If adopted, the proposal – classified as one of the “high level choices in the financial portfolio” – would impose a central investment structure across all Crown Financial Institutions (CFI), which include the $13 billion New Zealand Superannuation Fund and the $9.7 billion Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC) fund.

“At present the five CFIs are separate entities,” the government Investment Statement says. “A single fund manager across CFIs might increase efficiency and overall performance, and enable better aggregate risk management across the financial portfolio.”

As well as the ACC and NZ Super funds, CFIs also include the $4.5 billion Earthquake Corporation (EQC) fund and the $2.2 billion Government Superannuation Fund (GSF).

While classed as a CFI, the $1.35 billion National Provident Fund manages the private savings of individuals across several industry groups and falls under the government purview because it carries a Crown guarantee.

A spokesperson for the office of Finance Minister Bill English said the options included in the Investment Statement represented an “initial stocktake” of Crown assets and were not government policy.

Sponsored Content

“No decisions have been made or any in-depth analysis of the pros and cons [of creating a single CFI fund] has been carried out,” the spokesperson said.

Paul Dyer, economic adviser to Bill English, formerly held high-level investment positions at both NZ Super and the ACC fund.

The Investment Statement, also reveals the government would review the size and asset mix of the EQC fund (officially called the National Disaster Fund or NDF) following the massive earthquake that hit Christchurch this September.

“Both issues will need to be reassessed in the light of the Canterbury earthquake, which is likely to result in payments from the NDF of up to $1.1 billion,” the Investment Statement says.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous