North Carolina in need of ALM study, staff

The North Carolina Retirement System is in need of a formal asset liability study and is fundamentally understaffed, according to an independent review by Ennis Knupp commissioned by the State Treasurer.


The report said while the asset allocation had been established in a prudent manner, no formal asset liability study had been completed by an independent consultant.

It also specifically said the allocations to private equity and hedge funds may warrant reconsideration to evaluate whether they should be higher or lower, and that the separation of these two asset classes from the alternatives allocation should be considered.

While Ennis Knupp said the fund’s rebalancing policy appeared complete and conformed with best practice, the total fund’s actual allocations had not consistently been within the allowable ranges, indicating a possible deficiency in either the rebalancing mechanism or compliance procedures.

The report found the investment management division to be understaffed, even if it was filled to its capacity 26 positions.

“For a fund the size and complexity of the NCRS, Ennis Knupp would expect to see a significantly larger staff dedicated to asset management, even if the fund relied heavily on outside investment consultants. Given that the NCRS has used consultants to a minimal degree in the past, the existing staff size is barely adequate to fulfil all the duties required of prudent experts.”

Sponsored Content

It said the fund’s overall size of $70.5 billion and with a substantial allocation to internal management, along with a high number of private equity and real estate funds handled by the IMD staff, a staff size greater than the average of 30 was expected.

Since the report was completed, a chief investment officer, Shawn Wischmeier formerly CIO at the Indiana Public Employees’ Retirement Fund, has been hired.

The private equity unit, which manages a portfolio of more than $3 billion with more than 85 funds, has one staff member only. The consultant recommended between four and eight staff members was appropriate.

The Treasurer has responded to the review and is in the process of recruiting.

The review, completed in April and now made public, was conducted to evaluate the governance and investment practices of the NCRS to provide the Treasurer with recommendations for improvement.

It recommended investment policies be reviewed in light of the report’s recommendations, updated where appropriate, and consolidated into one comprehensive investment policy statement for the Treasurer’s consideration and formal approval.

A methodology to regularly monitor and report policy compliance to the Treasurer should also be discussed, it said.

Generally the report said: “After extensively examining the investment program of NCRS, we conclude that it is fundamentally sound and follows many practices that fall in line with common practices of other large institutional investors. We did, however, find room for enhancement in areas generally described as risk mitigation, transparency, organisational effectiveness, accountability, ethics and documentation.”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous