New Jersey winds back alternatives program

The $59 billion New Jersey Division of Investment, has made several changes to its alternatives investment portfolio including a slowdown in new commitments, on the back of a belief that large institutions with high allocations to alternatives will be forced to sell portions of their portfolios in order to raise liquidity and rebalance their overall asset allocations.

Its investment plan for this year will include a slowdown in new commitments to private equity, real estate and hedge funds; a greater focus on credit-related opportunities within private equity and real estate; and the targeting of potential opportunities to purchase interests in existing alternative investment partnerships in secondary market transactions.

At the end of December a new asset allocation was set which included a reduction in alternatives from 15.22 per cent in November 2008 to a new target for this year of 14.5 per cent. US high yield was the main beneficiary of the rejigged allocation (see table below).

A memo from William Clark, the director of the division of investments at the New Jersey department of treasury, outlined the plan to reduce or eliminate previously announced commitments, with the aim of providing greater flexibility to implement these strategies.

In private equity, the plan will reduce the commitment to three funds by about $115 million. For real estate, the plan will not close on two previously announced commitments totalling $250 million.

Sponsored Content

And for hedge funds it will redeem from one fund, Black River, and another fund which it was planning to redeem, Satellite Fund II, has announced it will wind down its operations. The total of these original investments was $200 million.

At the end of January the plan estimated its performance for the fiscal year was -22.58 per cent versus -24.57 per cent for the council benchmark.

Clark said this was attributable to an overweight position in domestic and international fixed income relative to public equities; an underweight position in commodities relative to benchmark; and an underweight position in financial services stocks in both domestic and international equities portfolios.

The new asset allocation sets ranges for each asset clss instead of target allocations. According to Clark the rationale for this was that given the extreme market volatility, the plan “strongly believes” that strategic asset allocations for institutional portfolios need to become more “market sensitive” than in the past.

He said the use of ranges would reinforce the consensus of the Council that the fund should maintain flexibility to react to rapidly changing economic conditions.

Table: New Jersey FY2009 asset allocation analysis

Asset class Nov 2008  actual % Target AA adopted in 2007 % Proposed FY2009 allocation midpoint %
US large cap equity 25.10 25.65 21.85
US small cap equity 1.32 1.35 1.15
International developed markets equity 14.52 21.00 17.00
Emerging markets equity 1.06 2.50 1.50
Total Public equity 42.00 50.50 41.50
Long-term US FI 29.57 23.75 30.00
US high yield 0.44 4.00 3.00
International FI 0.93 0.00 0.00
Total FI 30.94 27.75 33.00
Commodities and other real assets 1.77 4.00 3.00
TIPs 5.24 3.00 5.00
Total inflation-sensitive assets 7.01 7.00 8.00
Private equity 5.94 3.25 5.50
Direct real estate 3.67 2.50 4.00
Absolute return 5.61 6.0 5.00
Total alternatives 15.22 11.75 14.50
Cash 4.83 3.00 3.00
Grand total 100 100 100

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous