New Jersey chair calls for allocation review

Chair of the investment council of the $70 billion State of New Jersey’s Division of Investment, Robert Grady, has called for a new asset allocation plan, pointing in particular to the fund’s cash position which sits at around 2.75 per cent. The fund has also been overweight its domestic equity allocation by about 6 per cent since the last target was set in March.

At the November board meeting, director Tim Walsh advised the division was working to reduce the fund’s cash position, and Grady said “the need to look at the fund’s cash position was particularly germane given the need to dvelop a new asset allcoaiton plan”.

At that board meeting, the fund’s consultant, Peter Kelioutis of Strategic Investment Solutions, said a new asset allocation plan would not be set at the annual meeting; rather, the council would debate approaches to ascertain what was best for the fund.

The fund’s last asset allocation change saw US equities reduced from 21.85 per cent to 18 per cent, but it has been overweight this level by about 6 per cent each month since.

Kelioutis said if a new asset allocation was recommended after the meeting, it would most likely be adopted in the Northern hemisphere spring, one year since the current plan was adopted.

The major change in March 2010, which was decreasing target allocation for US equities, was done to reflect the 2009 market rally, according to the 2010-2011 investment plan outline.

Sponsored Content

The outline acknowledged this allocation was substantially overweight relative to the 2009 ranges set for public equities, and underweight in inflation-sensitive and alternative investments. Since the new asset allocation the difference between target allocations and actual allocations have jumped from 4.53 per cent in February 2010 to 7.19 per cent in April 2010.

At the end of November, the financial year-to-date performance for the fund was 8.71 per cent, slightly outperforming its benchmark’s 8.53 per cent.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Why integrated reporting makes sense: Robert Eccles

Robert Eccles has been trying to change the nature of corporate reporting for more than 20 years. He has been an advocate for supplementing financials with information on non-financial factors that are leading indicators of financial results – such as product development, customer satisfaction and the development of intangible assets. The premise is those companies

Opportunities in Europe

Investors and academics agree that political developments in Greece are important because they may shape how financial markets will respond to future political situations in the Eurozone. But according to Olivier Rousseau, the executive director of the FFR, the French pension reserve fund, there is more hype outside of the Eurozone on the implications of

More evidence big is better in pension funds

A pension fund that has 10 times more assets under management has on average 7.67 basis points lower annual investment costs according to a working paper from authors at De Nederlansche Bank, that explores the relationship between pension fund size and investment costs. Written by Dirk Broeders, Arco van Oord and David Rijsbergen the paper

European investment plan requires public private collaboration

The two largest institutional investors in the Netherlands, PGGM and APG, have responded to the European Commission’s investment plan, urging the commission to call on institutional investors to collaborate on the investment proposal. However they also warn that institutional investors are not just a “subsidising entity” and the Juncker Plan is best executed as a

Why Andrew Ang joined Blackrock

Andrew Ang believes factor investing is a more efficient way to organise a portfolio as it allows liquid and illiquid strategies to be managed across the portfolio. It also has the added benefit of honing managers on value creation. He’s been working with a handful of investors while Professor of Finance at Columbia University on

The power of engagement

It is called the “CalPERS’ Effect” but it could easily be called the asset owner effect, or the institutional investor effect, or the power of engagement effect. Wilshire, which is a consultant to the $300 billion Californian fund CalPERS, has provided an update on its study measuring the effect of engagement on a targeted list of companies called the Focus List.

Previous