NEST believes in passive management

A preference for passive management underpins the investment beliefs of the new UK defined contribution fund, NEST, which has finally outlined its investment approach.

Although one of the beliefs is that passive management – where available – generally delivers better value for money than active security selection, it also says that taking investment risk is usually rewarded in the long term.

The seven investment beliefs also incorporate environmental, social and governance factors and that risk-derived asset allocation is the biggest determinant of long-term performance.

Retirement Date Funds are the default fund option for NEST, and the expectation is that 90 per cent of members will invest in the 45 NEST Retirement Date Funds on offer.

Members will be enrolled into the fund that targets the year they are expected to want to take their money out of the fund Additional fund choices include a higher risk fund, a lower growth fund, a Sharia fund, an ethical fund, and a pre-retirement fund.

The investment target for the funds is investment returns in excess of inflation after all charges over the long term. In the growth phase the performance target will be CPI plus 3 per cent

Sponsored Content

There are three phases in accumulation – the foundation, growth and consolidation phases – and the transition between them will be managed dynamically on the basis of what is happening in financial markets and the economy.

Chair of NEST, Lawrence Churchill said that agreeing the investment approach was a significant landmark for NEST in achieving its aim of helping millions save confidently for retirement.

“The investment strategy will develop over time and we are confident our approach will encourage saving and support our members in achieving their aspirations for retirement.”

NEST investment beliefs

1. That understanding scheme member characteristics, circumstances and attitudes is essential to developing and maintaining an appropriate investment strategy

2. That as long-term investors, incorporating environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors within the investment process is in the interests of members

3. That taking investment risk is usually rewarded in the long term

4. That diversification is the key tool for managing risk and return

5. That risk-derived asset allocation is the biggest determinant of long-term performance

6. That analysis of both economic conditions and market regimes should be used to drive strategic decisions

7. That passive management – where available – generally delivers better value for money than active security selection.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Maverick Series video: Gonski part I

In the first of a new series of video interviews featuring thought leaders in global institutional investment, chair of the $80 billion Australian Future Fund, David Gonski, outlines his views on governance. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

ATP reunites alpha and beta after 6 years

Alpha and beta rely to a large extent on exposures to systematic risk factors, so goes the “2013 thinking” of ATP in reversing the decision to separate alpha and beta in its investment portfolio six years ago. ATP has separate hedging and investment portfolios, with the hedging portfolio significantly larger at around DKK 670 billion

State Street’s Probyn into 2013

The current equity rally is not predicated on a shift in economic performance, according to chief economist at State Street, Chris Probyn, who says it would be reasonable to say the market may “pause for thought”. Probyn says the move from fixed income to equities has been fostered by some of the “economic areas for

CalPERS’ sustainability initiative drives investment beliefs

Launched this week, CalPERS’ Sustainable Investment Research Initiative (SIRI) will drive the development the $250-billion fund’s first set of investment beliefs. While difficult to believe a fund of its size, reach and history could invest without a set of investment beliefs, it is encouraging to see that sustainability will be a core part of that

Finnish pension reform a lesson for all

The findings from the first review of the Finnish pension system, commissioned by the Finnish Centre for Pensions, were handed down by Nicholas Barr from the London School of Economics and Keith Ambachtsheer from the Rotman International Centre for Pension Management last month. Although Helsinki in January is far from a party Ambachtsheer and Barr

European investors stay on the offensive

2012 was a year of battles for European pension funds. An ongoing war was waged against a severe regulatory challenge from the European Commission in the shape of Solvency II-style legislation. Aside from the uncertain struggle of that campaign, major European investors gained plenty of credit from standing up to corporate boards in the “shareholder

Previous