Let’s work together quickly: Stronger Super chair

The time for ideological argument was over, said the chair of the Stronger Super Committee, Paul Costello, and the industry should work constructively to implement the Australian Government’s response to the Cooper Review.

Costello and the rest of the committee met for the first time last week with the Minister for Superannuation, Bill Shorten, and the first priority was to appoint working committees for the four reform streams to be implemented: MySuper, SuperStream, Governance and SMSFs.

While the committee will provide broad, high-level advice on the design and implementation of the reforms, the working committees will drill down into technical specifics, and give practitioners beyond those on the committee a chance for further input.

Costello said this should address any concerns about a lack of direct operational expertise on the committee, none of whom have ever run a large super fund, with the exception of course of Costello himself. (He was CEO at Superannuation Trust of Australia and New Zealand Super, before his four-year stint at the helm of the Future Fund Management Agency.)

The working committees are close to be finalised, Costello said. Their prompt formation was necessary because Costello planned to hand the Federal Treasury the Committee’s implementation recommendations by “May or June”.

The industry veteran said he wanted to be part of the Stronger Super implementation because it could help provide a better retirement for working Australians, and he urged stakeholders to keep that goal in mind.

Sponsored Content

“The [Stronger Super] report will record where there are differences in preferred approach by the committee members, but I think the Government is really interested in consensus,” he said.

Acknowledging that ‘MySuper’ was one of the most controversial aspects of the reforms, Costello said the committee would give regard to maximising the long-term net returns received by working Australians, and not just minimising the upfront costs incurred by their fund.

Asset Owner:Future Fund

One response to “Let’s work together quickly: Stronger Super chair”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Maverick Series video: Gonski part I

In the first of a new series of video interviews featuring thought leaders in global institutional investment, chair of the $80 billion Australian Future Fund, David Gonski, outlines his views on governance. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

ATP reunites alpha and beta after 6 years

Alpha and beta rely to a large extent on exposures to systematic risk factors, so goes the “2013 thinking” of ATP in reversing the decision to separate alpha and beta in its investment portfolio six years ago. ATP has separate hedging and investment portfolios, with the hedging portfolio significantly larger at around DKK 670 billion

State Street’s Probyn into 2013

The current equity rally is not predicated on a shift in economic performance, according to chief economist at State Street, Chris Probyn, who says it would be reasonable to say the market may “pause for thought”. Probyn says the move from fixed income to equities has been fostered by some of the “economic areas for

CalPERS’ sustainability initiative drives investment beliefs

Launched this week, CalPERS’ Sustainable Investment Research Initiative (SIRI) will drive the development the $250-billion fund’s first set of investment beliefs. While difficult to believe a fund of its size, reach and history could invest without a set of investment beliefs, it is encouraging to see that sustainability will be a core part of that

Finnish pension reform a lesson for all

The findings from the first review of the Finnish pension system, commissioned by the Finnish Centre for Pensions, were handed down by Nicholas Barr from the London School of Economics and Keith Ambachtsheer from the Rotman International Centre for Pension Management last month. Although Helsinki in January is far from a party Ambachtsheer and Barr

European investors stay on the offensive

2012 was a year of battles for European pension funds. An ongoing war was waged against a severe regulatory challenge from the European Commission in the shape of Solvency II-style legislation. Aside from the uncertain struggle of that campaign, major European investors gained plenty of credit from standing up to corporate boards in the “shareholder

Previous