Fund collaboration first step to joint investment

European pension fund service providers PGGM and PKA have agreed on an innovative knowledge exchange that eventually aims to look for joint investment opportunities as well as improving the way the funds conduct risk management and the benchmarking of investments, costs and socially responsible investing.

Martin van Rijn, chief executive officer for Dutch pension fund service provider, PGGM, says that while the knowledge exchange is in its infancy, both organisations aim to be catalysts for greater research and improved investment approaches.

In a statement to Top1000funds.com van Rijn lists the areas of cooperation as:

  • Deepening of research and fact finding on risk management
  • Creating joint venture investment opportunities and benchmark selection
  • Sharing and benchmarking of socially responsible investment (SRI) methodology
  • Benchmarking of costs and cost transparency
  • Developing of common projects on membership involvement.

The knowledge exchange is the first of its kind for PGGM, but van Rijn says that cooperation with other potential partners is a realistic possibility.

“PGGM is always interested in cooperating with compatible partners,” he says.

“When a pension fund service provider has the same goals, profile, core values and operates in a similar market, we would be interested to explore the possibilities.”

Sponsored Content

 

Synergies say it all

Van Rijn explains that the two organisations have a number of synergies, which include a strong consideration of social, environmental and corporate governance (ESG) factors in their investments.

PKA and PGGM are signatories to the UN-backed Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) and screen investments based on pre-established ethical principles.

When it comes to their investments, the funds also both invest in DONG Energy, a Danish company with interests in offshore oil extraction and renewable energy.

Both organisations invest on behalf of several pension funds with participants in the health and social sector in their respective countries.

PGGM manages, on behalf of six pension funds, around €115 billion ($151.6 billion) in pension assets for 2.5 million people. The Dutch pension fund service provider offers pension management, integrated asset management, management support and policy advice to its institutional customers.

PKA is a joint administration company for five Danish pension funds and has $27.7 billion in assets under management on behalf of 250,000 members of the health care and social sectors. Along with managing investments for the funds, PKA handles administration.

PGGM oversees – like PKA – a hybrid defined contribution/defined benefit scheme.

PKA manages investments according to the particular strategies decided by each of the five pension funds – even though they are similar and their asset allocations alike.

 

Responsible action

As part of integrating socially responsible investment principles into its investment strategies, PKA uses British ESG research EIRIS as part of all investments and Hermes EOS for the ongoing engagement activities.

Also conducting engagements itself, PGGM has in recent years expanded its SRI team, and since 2001 has used UK asset manager F&C Investments to complement its in-house activities. These include what it describes as “structural, systematic and visible dialogue with the financial markets and the individual companies” the organisation invests in.

As part of its responsible investment program it has also sought collaboration with other investors, including a recent working group on agriculture investment.

In conjunction with this collaborative work, PGGM has published a position paper outlining its approach to investing in agriculture, including an explanation of its investments in agricultural commodities.

Asset Owner:PGGM / PFZW

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous