Joe Dear warns of “reform facade”

Chief investment officer of CalPERS, and chair of the Council of Institutional Investors, Joe Dear, has warned of a “reform facade” as memories of the crisis fade and resistance to reform instensifies, calling for a more comprehensive regulatory umbrella, and specifically for most over the counter derivatives to be traded on exchanges, in a speech at the National Press Club in Washington this week.

While Dear said he was pleased to see legislation advancing to regulate derivative transactions, hold credit ratings agencies accountable and to strengthen the SEC, “we’re finding that the headwinds of entrenched Wall Street interests still blowing briskly on the Hill”.

“Even big pension funds like CalPERS lack the lobbying clout of Wall Street… and there are few lobbyists for the individual investors,” he said. “Wall Street sometimes pleads passionately on behalf of America’s investors. Somehow, I keep hearing sharks pleading on behalf of the swimmers.”

He said revitalising the SEC and other federal agencies begins with making sure that they have the necessary staffing and budget resources to fulfull their mission. He also said as part of wider reform credit agencies should be held accountable for their assessments and a Consumer Financial Protection Agency needed to be created.

In his speech titled, Averting Financial Crisis: Regulatory Reform & Corporate Governance, he said one of the main causes of the crisis was the total failure of the financial services regulatory system.

Sponsored Content

“I am worried that as memories of the crash fade and the resistance to reform intensifies, that all we’ll be left with is the facade of reform, not the real thing,” he said.

“Our economy, the financial and housing sectors in particular, is propped up by government spending and credit guarantees. Could we be staring in to the abyss again anytime soon?”

Legislation due to be voted this week in the US House Financial Services Committee reaffirms the statutory authority of the Securities and Exchange Commission to give shareowners access to the proxy ballots that companies use for board elections.

“This proxy access proposal is one piece of a major fix for our regulatory system and corporate practices so there won’t be another financial crisis,” he said.

More comprehensively, he said the report by the Investors Working Group, sponsored by the CII and the CFA Institute Centre for Financial Market Integrity, outlined what should be on the market reform agenda.

The group’s roadmap for reform focuses on strengthening and reinvigorating existing federal regulatory agencies; closing cirtical gaps in regulation; and improving the corproate governance of US public companies.

The Investors’ Working Group is urging adoption of strong corporate governance practices among public companies at the board level.

This includes advocating the separation of the chief executive and chair; have directors stand for annual election; the right to say on pay by shareowners; and the right for shareowners to place their nominees for board directly on the proxty ballots in annual elections.

“Behind the total failure of the regulatory system to protect individual and institutional investors was the belief that markets are self regulating and that the least government action is always the preferred option. In the annals of mistaken beliefs, this has to be one of the most expensive and consequential ones. Yet as I listen to the debates on the legislation now moving through Congress, I hear echoes of this pernicious idea. Can our memories really be that short?”

“We are all too familiar with events predicted by risk models to be exceedingly rare happening several times a week. Who thinks that we should head into the future with a superficially better regulatory system that can once again enable the reckless risk taking whose consequences we will be dealing with – and pay for – in the years ahead?”

For the full speech click here

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous