Investors take credit in Say on Pay reform

Investor action through letters and company dialogue has resulted in more than 40 companies in the US, including Goldman Sachs, State Street, BNY Mellon and Conoco, agreeing to implement Say on Pay reform, according to Timothy Smith, senior vice president, Walden Asset Management who recently coordinated a letter signed by investors including CalPERS chief investment officer Joe Dear, urging 17 financial institutions, including Bank of America, to adopt reform.

“We believe it is critically important for investors to engage companies on say on pay via letters, dialogue and shareholder resolutions. The average vote on these resolutions in this last year’s proxy season was close to 46 per cent, with more than 25 votes over 50 per cent, which sent a very strong message to management,” he said.

CalPERS was among 30 investors that signed the open letter to 17 financial institutions asking them to follow other financial services industry companies to enact the shareholder advisory vote on executive compensation, or Say on Pay.

“We applaud Goldman Sachs, State Street and Bank of New York Mellon for leading the way to enact this important corporate governance reform,” Joe Dear said in a statement. “While CalPERS doesn’t see a shareowner advisory vote as a panacea, companies that adopt the policy will significantly advance sound governance goals of improved accountability to investors and the creation of long-term share value.”

Smith said investors were at the forefront of the reform movement, and while there was still hope that legislation would provide guidance for all companies, it is unclear where the Senate vote is headed.

Sponsored Content

The letter went to 17 companies including Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, Northern Trust, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, US Bancorp, Waddell & Reed, BB&T, Capital One Financial, American Express, PNC Financial Services, SunTrust, Fifth Third, Comerica, KeyCorp and Regions Financial.

Other signatories include representatives of the California State Teachers’ Retirement System; United Methodist Church General Board of Pension and Health Benefits; Firefighters’ Pension Systems of Kansas City, Mo.; TIAA-CREF; and the Council of Institutional Investors.

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Australian contributions increase shifts retirement burden

The increase in the Australian superannuation guarantee (SG) from 9 to 12 per cent of salary is an example of how the retirement savings burden, a global phenomenon, can be shifted from the public to private sectors, according to senior partner at Mercer, David Knox. The increase in the SG, which has been approved in

Why you should take notice of what we write

New research released this month gives impetus to the evidence that newspaper articles can predict aggregate future stock returns. Conducted by Professor of Finance at the University of St Gallen in Switzerland, Manuel Ammann, it examines articles in the German finance paper, Handeslblatt, from July 1989 until March 2011, and overall found that “newspaper content

CalPERS to move $1bn fixed income in-house

CalPERS plans to move $1 billion of its externally-managed international fixed income portfolio in-house in the next 12 months, but it will require board approval to do so.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Texas Teachers extends manager partnerships

Texas Teachers Retirement System has extended a unique public markets strategic partnership structure to two of its private market managers in a move it claims will give the fund a long-term strategic advantage over other investors.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Keynes and the character required for a long-term view

In the interests of educating myself I recently read Chapter 12 “The State of Long-Term Expectations” in John Maynard Keynes’ seminal economics tome General Theory. I particularly like his statement: “it needs more intelligence to defeat the forces of time and our ignorance of the future than to beat the gun”, but then I’ve always

Recipe for avoiding half-baked dynamic asset allocation

In what is lauded as somewhat of a Laurel and Hardy performance, APG’s Stefan Lundbergh and academic provocateur Jack Gray, demonstrate the disparity between ideology and action in a hypothetical dynamic asset allocation case study. But jokes aside, it highlights the misnomer in the words “best practice”, and the lack of courage in this industry.

Previous