Investors demand company action on climate change

Some of the world’s largest investors have outlined their expectations of how companies should respond to climate change.

Jointly issued by three investor groups on climate change, the document outlines seven steps investors expect companies to take in order to minimise the risks and maximise the opportunities presented by climate change.

The seven steps cover areas of governance, strategy, goals, implementation, measurement, disclosure and public policy.

CalSTRS chief executive Jack Ehnes – who is also on the executive committee of the the Investor Network on Climate Change, one of the three investor groups behind the document – says that the guidelines provide a framework for engagement.

“These guidelines are a clear message to companies that investors expect them to step up and better navigate this complex climate challenge,” Ehnes says.

The guidelines are seen as being of particular importance for companies in carbon-intensive sectors, and those who may not have a considered strategy for managing climate change risks.

Sponsored Content

The guidelines demand companies report and disclose emission inventories as well as articulate in annual reports what the management deems to be the company’s material climate change risks and opportunities.

The other investor groups involved in formulating the guidelines are the European Institutional Investor Group on Climate Change and the Investors Group on Climate Change based in Australia and New Zealand.

To read the statement click here

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous