Investors collaborate on governance guide

A practical guide to good governance for pension board trustees was one of the results of the Rotman ICPM Board Effectiveness Program which included participants from 21 funds from nine countries.

The program, the first of its kind to be aimed specifically at board members of pension funds and other long-horizon investment institutions, looked at the functionality of boards, examining when they get stuck and why, as well as the right way for a board to approach strategy, planning and execution.

The impetus for the program came from the desire of the program’s academic director, Keith Ambachtsheer, to provide help to pension fund boards to overcome areas where they may be dysfunctional, which he believes arise from a desire to implement rather than oversee.

The program asked participants to submit in advance the top challenges facing their boards. This revealed good governance and sensible investment beliefs as the two of the key challenges.

As a result of the program, which is collaboration between Rotman Executive Programs and the Rotman International Centre for Pension Management, a plan was developed for trustees to use as a guide.

The good governance advisory team decided on three key steps to implementing a governance improvement program:

Sponsored Content
  1. Create a current board skills/experience matrix and document board member roles and behaviours.
  2. Revisit the organisation’s mission and mandate, formalise board processes and agree on board norms and behaviours.
  3. Implement the roadmap through updating board policy documents, through internal board bonding sessions and external board training.

Similarly participants developed a step-by-step guide with regard to sensible investment beliefs and organisation design that included:

  1. Investment beliefs should be explicit
  2. If you have scale then insource
  3. Insource in stages, with public equities first
  4. Prepare the ground for the required compensation plan
  5. Build capacity for internal management.

The other challenges nominated by the board included robust risk management, effective stakeholder communications, and financial sustainability.

The program will be held again next month, and is already sold out, but to register for future offerings visit www.rotman.utoronto.ca/icpm

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

CFA to lead industry out of crisis

Protecting the pension system is one of six key themes at the centre of the CFA Institute’s Future of Finance initiative as it aims to empower the investment industry to take leadership in restoring trust. Speaking at the sixty-sixth annual CFA Institute conference in Singapore this week, president and chief executive of the CFA Institute,

Tail risk parity, V 1.0

Just when you thought you were safe, the next reiteration of risk parity has arrived. AllianceBernstein’s tail risk parity takes the concept of risk parity, reallocating assets uniformly according to risk, but it uses tail risk, not volatility, as the core measure. The concept of risk parity is a portfolio diversified according to risk, rather

Retirement: a cause worth working on

There are two things that drive the newly appointed global chief operating officer of State Street Global Advisors, Greg Ehret, in his bid to improve the client experience: the retirement business is a cause worth working on and the clients are the reason the business exists. Ehret was appointed to the new position at SSgA,

Pension funds, where banks no longer go?

There continues to be potential for pension capital appearing where bank lending no longer wants to go. Commentators in the UK and continental Europe have heightened expectations that pension funds will step in to help fill the continent’s bank financing gap. Societe Generale, for instance, recently predicted further “disintermediation” by investors sidestepping banks and looking

Building consensus for investment beliefs at CalPERS

An investment-beliefs workshop for the CalPERS board, held in April, revealed five areas, including active management, where the views of the board and staff lacked consensus. The contentious, or unsettled, topics for discussion were active management, private asset classes, sustainability (environmental, social and governance), investment performance targets and stakeholder considerations. At the board workshop, Janine

Behind PGGM’s ESG index

In 2010 PGGM conducted a study to see if it was possible to reduce the number of companies it invested in from 4000 to 400, based on its environmental, social and governance leanings, and still maintain it’s beta risk/return profile. The idea was that the €133-billion ($174-billion) fund would better know and understand what it

Previous