Howard Marks on alpha and making money

“It used to be easier to make money,” Oaktree Capital Management founder and chairman, Howard Marks muses as he discusses meeting the demands and goals of his clients in 2014.

Marks is an avid communicator, and has been writing memos to clients for 24 years. The result is his book “The Most Important Thing”, which Warren Buffett’s review on the front cover summarises as “…that rarity, a useful book”.

His January memo is a 4,000-word musing on the role of luck. In it he discusses many things including “alpha” which he defines as superior personal skill.

“It used to be easier to make money. If you look at the history of inefficiency, there were markets that people didn’t have access to, there was infrastructure that was lacking and investments that were unknown. Now everyone knows everything about everything,” he says.

There was a time, not so long ago, that high yield bonds, the asset class where Marks started his career, were considered “improper”. He rues the

fact there are “no structural inefficiencies anymore.”

Sponsored Content

“I call this process ‘efficient-isation’, and it’s the norm.”

However what does still exist is cyclical inefficiencies and he’s only too aware that “people do panic at the lows and sell, or at least fail to buy”.

“It requires a certain degree of malfunction for the market to allow an investor to find a bargain, buy it on the cheap and enjoy an excess return. But it takes a greater degree of malfunction for everyone else to fail to notice that investors’ success, fail to emulate his methods, and thus allow the bargain to persist. Usually a free-lunch counter should be expected to be picked clean,” he says in the memo.

Given this “efficient-isation” Marks believes fund managers should focus on managing the expectations of clients.

howard marks 400x200

“Investment is still very much about alpha, but it’s harder to find and there is less of it,” he says. “So expectations need to be managed.”

Marks has worked with Bruce Karsh, who sits alongside him as number 296 on the Forbes 400 list of richest people in America, for 27 years, and he believes this longevity and stability speaks volumes for the firm’s success. His other co-founders have been with him longer.

“We have lived together through three major credit cycles,” Marks says, and he believes that working closely with a team for a long period of time creates a joint philosophy and lessons learnt which facilitates a strong environment.

“It’s constructive, not competitive, and we have a conducive compensation system that stresses teamwork,” Marks says, adding a key ingredient for success is retaining star performers.

A Wharton and University of Chicago graduate, Marks’ time in the markets has taught him to be contrarian, something you can’t learn in a class room.

“It’s the human side of investing that you can’t know when you’re at school,” he says. “It’s the importance of being contrarian, keeping your emotions in control and applying second level thinking.

“Investing is not physics: you can’t apply laws and assume it’ll work the same every time. With golf you can play 100 times and learn more about how to play a given hole each time you play. But with investing the course plays back and so do the other players.”

Quoting George Soros’ reflexivity – that the actions of people in an environment alter it – Marks says that investing in large part consists of predicting outcomes, and success comes from predicting more correctly than others.

“It’s relative to the universe. The first level thinker says ‘the company is good, buy it’ but the second level thinker says ‘the company is good but as good as people think so it’s overpriced: sell it’.”

An example of this is the firm’s success throughout the financial crisis, when it put to work more than $6 billion in the last quarter of 2008 following the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers.

“It almost didn’t matter what you bought. But it’s not just intellectual, you also have to have to keep emotion under control,” he says.

 

Oaktree Capital Management, which invests in less efficient markets including credit, distressed debt, real estate and emerging market equities and manages $83 billion in assets, went public in April 2012.

Marks says, he was looking for an alternative to public listing, and as a result the company sold stock privately in 2007 and joined Goldman Sachs’ market for unregistered equities. But that route failed to create the liquidity needed to facilitate general transition, so an IPO followed five years later.

He denies that being a public company has changed the focus of the firm, asserting there is still the same sense of responsibility to do a good job for clients.

“People ask about a conflict of interests, but I think it’s not conflict but congruence. If you put the clients, first the business will be successful and you will make money for the shareholders,” he says. “It is not right to do just anything for the sole purpose of boosting assets under management. It has to work for the clients.”

He says a great firm has to stand for something other than AUM, and for his firm that is the Oaktree investment philosophy: the primacy of risk control, emphasis on consistency, the importance of market inefficiency, the benefits of specialisation, macro-forecasting not being critical to investing, and disavowal of market timing.

“We study the markets as they are today and take our cues from valuation and investor behaviour,” he says.

Marks’ outlook is that asset prices are elevated by central banks, and that when quantitative easing unwinds interest rates will rise. His mantra today is “move forward but with caution”.

“I think long bond rates will rise moderately, with the 10-year moving perhaps to 4 per cent. I don’t think it will go to 7 per cent, maybe to 4 per cent. Short rates are low also but they will rise more.”

The firm has 18 strategies, with high yield bonds and distressed debt the “tent poles”. Real estate is growing in importance, and an asset class Marks really likes.

The firm has raised $6 billion in the past two years for strategies that didn’t exist two years ago.

“We’re raising small funds, investing carefully and trimming expectations,” he says. “Today the key lies in caution, not aggressiveness.”

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Social networks in the investment web

Reels of financial data and analysis coupled with the occasional piece of market gossip or personal hunch are the time-honoured tools investors rely on in building an active portfolio. More recently, an element of sustainability or corporate governance analysis has tried to muscle into the process. Soon there will be another revolutionary option complementing financial

Eijffinger’s decade of financial repression

Financial repression will define the economic landscape for at least another decade, according to professor of financial economics at Tilburg University, Sylvester Eijffinger, which has serious implications for institutional investors. Eijffinger, who also is also a visiting professor at Harvard, sits on the monetary experts panel of the European Union and is an adviser to

Is reviving Europe a suspended apparition?

Getting Europe’s swelling institutional capital to support long-term projects that could benefit its uninspired economies was an idea that sent heads nodding around the continent as it suffered the brunt of the financial crisis. Get pension, insurance and foundation money into where it is most needed with the attraction of reliable long-term cash flows and

Let’s talk about underfunding

Even using the assets of the pension plan was not enough of a leg-up to save the city of Detroit from bankruptcy. As the last words in the song Put your hands up for Detroit by Fedde Le Grand say, it is system shutdown. The fiscal demise of this city may be a lesson for

Johnson urges pension simplicity

There is a David-and-Goliath feeling to the battle Michael Johnson, a research fellow at the London-based think tank the Centre for Policy Studies, is waging against the pension industry. His research, which lays out the case for radically simplifying all aspects of the United Kingdom’s pension sector, has earned him a reputation as a maverick.

Disparity in policy portfolio risk profiles

A policy portfolio is a poor reflection of investor preferences, argued Peter Bernstein. This philosophical question has now been empirically tested by MIT’s Mark Kritzman, who shows the inter-temporal disparity of a policy portfolio’s risk profile. He suggests a simple framework for addressing this deficiency. Kritzman encourages investors to replace rigid policy portfolios with flexible investment policies.

Previous