How many top100 sustainable companies do you invest in?

The most sustainable 100 companies in the world, as measured by Corporate Knights, outperformed the MSCI by 12.4 per cent since the list’s inception in February 2005, it was announced at Davos last week.

From February 1, 2005, to December 31, 2011, the “Global 100 Most Sustainable Corporations” list has achieved a total return of 41.7 per cent, outperforming the MSCI All Country World Index, which returned 29.30 per cent over the same time period.

The list is compiled by assessing 11 key performance indicators (listed below) including linking senior executive pay to remuneration.

Chief executive of Corporate Knights, Toby Heaps, says the Global 100 shows it is now possible to score companies on clean capitalism criteria with a quantitative approach.

He says a minor revolution due to more readily available ESG data, combined with the industry group comparison synthesis his company uses, removes a crucial barrier that has been preventing institutional investors from integrating ESG into their passive strategies.

This year the number one ranked company in the global 100 was the Danish Novo Nordisk, which is the only pharmaceutical company in the list to report the link between CEO remuneration and corporate performance on clean capitalism KPIs.

Sponsored Content

Chief executive of Corporate Knights, Toby Heaps, says: “The Global 100 companies serve as ambassadors for a better, cleaner kind of capitalism which, it also turns out, is more profitable.”

“Employee turnover” was included as a new indicator for the first time this year.

It is the eighth year annual list of the most sustainable large corporations in the world, and this year the companies were recognised at the Davos World Economic Forum at a private dinner hosted by Corporate Knights and Inflection Point Capital Management.

Heaps says the mission of CK Capital, which provides a suite of products based on the passive methodology, has a seven-year goal to enable $1 trillion of assets to be optimised to clean-cap, volatility-reducing criteria.

Global 100 Key Performance Indicators Definitions
• Energy productivity ($) – sales ($) / total direct and indirect energy consumption (gigajoules)
• Carbon productivity ($) – sales ($) / total CO2 and CO2 equivalents emissions (tonnes)
• Water productivity ($) – sales ($) / total water use (cubic meters)
• Waste productivity ($) – sales ($) / total amount of waste produced (tonnes)
• Leadership diversity – percentage of women board directors
• CEO-to-average worker pay – ratio of highest paid officer’s compensation to average employee compensation (three-year average)
• Percentage tax paid – percentage reported tax obligation paid in cash (three-year average)
• Safety productivity – sales ($) / lost-time incidents*$50k and fatalities*$1M)
• Sustainability remuneration – whether or not at least one senior officer has his/her pay linked to sustainability
• Innovation capacity – R&D/sales (three-year average)
• Employee turnover – total number of employees who leave the organisation voluntarily or due to dismissal, retirement, or death in service as a percentage of the total employee numbers at the end of the reporting period.

For the full list of the most sustainable companies click here: http://www.global100.org/annual-lists/2012-global-100-list.html

 

 


Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous