Gaddafi SWF investees revolt and freeze funds

As tensions in Libya increase, a leading authority on sovereign wealth funds has urged investee entities of the Libyan Investment Authority (LIA) to freeze its holdings, until such time as they are needed to rebuild an independent Libya.

Ashby Monk, the co-director of Oxford University’s Sovereign Wealth Fund Project (Oxford SWF), was encouraged by the news that Pearson plc, the publisher of the Financial Times, had interpreted its obligations under the UK Government’s Libya (Financial Sanctions) Order as an immediate freeze of the LIA’s 3.27 per cent stake.

The UK Treasury has frozen the assets of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi (pictured), but has not said if the LIA’s assets are included, the BBC reported.

In contrast, the US government has frozen $30 billion of Gaddafi family, LIA and central bank assets.

In addition, the European Union has frozen assets of Col Gaddafi and five family members, the BBC said, and has also banned the supply of arms, ammunition and any equipment that could be used for “internal repression”.

A Canadian asset freeze announcement “probably” referred to the LIA’s stake in oil and gas producer Verenex, the Oxford SWF’s Monk opined.

Sponsored Content

The SWF expert noted that Gaddafi cronies made up most of the LIA trustee board. One trustee, Libyan central bank governor Farhat Bengadara, has not been heard from since the anti-government protests began in earnest.

“Given that the [LIA] is often reported to have roughly $70 billion – which represents nearly 75 per cent of [Libya’s] GDP – the fund could prove extremely useful in reconstruction. So let’s freeze it until such a time as better leadership takes over in the country. Then let’s turn it over to them,” Monk said.

The Oxford SWF Project is funded by the Leverhulme Trust and the The Rotman International Centre for Pension Management. It is tasked with documenting, analysing and conceptualising the governance of sovereign wealth funds.

Monk, who is a research fellow at the University of Oxford, is researching the design and governance of financial institutions, with particular focus on pension and sovereign wealth funds.

Leave a Comment

More from this fund

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous