Future Fund takes big step for corporate governance

The A$58 billion ($46 billion) Australian Future Fund has made a number of corporate governance-related decisions, including bringing its proxy voting for domestic shares in-house and the creation of an environmental, social and governance risk management function.

 

Gordon Hagart has been appointed to lead the Fund’s approach to environmental, social and governance risk management, while Rebecca Farrell will develop and implement a proxy voting policy.

The Future Fund has to date left proxy voting up to its funds managers (except for its Telstra shares), after first ensuring each manager’s governance outlook aligned with its own. Farrell will help in-source the voting decisions on Australian holdings, but any decision on hiring an external proxy voting adviser for offshore holdings is some way down the track.

The Fund has about 10 per cent of its portfolio in Australian equities, while 15.5 per cent is in global developed markets, and 3 per cent is in global developing markets. It still has about 41 per cent in cash.

Sponsored Content

Hagart will focus on influencing Future Fund investee companies to appropriately manage their environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks to protect shareholder value. He will also work with the broader investment team to identify relevant investment opportunities, particularly on environmental grounds.

Hagart will start in October, reporting to general manager Paul Costello with a ‘dotted line’ to chief investment officer David Neal.

Hagart joins the Future Fund from consultancy onValues, a Switzerland-based firm that combines traditional investment analysis with knowledge of environmental, social and governance drivers.

His career history includes the role of programme manager with the United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative (UNEP FI), where his responsibilities included the United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment. The Future Fund is not yet a signatory.

Meanwhile, Rebecca Farrell’s efforts to develop and implement a proxy voting policy for the Future Fund commence immediately. Farrell was most recently a partner corporate governance with Clarendon Lawyers, was previously a senior associate with Freehills in its corporate governance advisory team and has also worked as a
transactional lawyer in Melbourne and New York.

Asset Owner:Future Fund

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Blinder: a power of paradox at Princeton

Pension funds or any investor holding a slug of long-term fixed income needs to factor in some capital losses soon, says Princeton academic and former vice president of the Federal Reserve, Alan Blinder. “The timing is difficult to predict, but three or 15 months, it doesn’t matter. It is predictable,” he says. “The unpredictable part

UniSuper defies accepted thinking

Mention any asset class to John Pearce, chief investment officer of Australian superannuation fund UniSuper, and he will doggedly set out the good and bad thinking around it. A common source of his ire is the sight of investors herding around a belief based on a lack of rigorous thinking. Good practice for him involves

OTPP deals with underfunding

Even the most successful and well run pension plans are facing underfunding challenges. The $129-billion Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan is the latest to investigate solutions to solve the mismatch between the pension promise and the funds required to meet that, says Jim Leech, chief executive of the organisation . OTPP has appointed a taskforce – chaired

Fewer, bigger funds for UK?

Australia, the US, Canada and Denmark have all done it. Kazakhstan and even Oman are talking about it. Increasingly, public sector pension funds are merging or pooling their assets into fewer bigger schemes. It’s no surprise the debate is gathering momentum in the United Kingdom, ripe for consolidation with a Local Government Pension Fund Scheme

Scenario analysis: applicable to anything?

Attempts to apply a formula to asset allocation based on an asset’s historical volatility and relationship with other assets tend to fail when presented with black-swan events. Equities tend to rise along with commodities except when presented with political events such as the price hikes in oil in 1973 that sent equities into free fall.

Kurtzer on Holy Land of opportunity

The Middle East is in a state of dynamic flux, with positive change manifesting itself in the countries going through an economic and financial revolution as much as a political one. Institutional investors from all parts of the world have a role to play in that revolution, according to former US ambassador to Egypt and

Previous