Future Fund chief departs, alternative weightings increase

Paul Costello

Four years after becoming its first employee, Paul Costello will leave his role as general manager of Australia’s Future Fund, saying “new leadership” was appropriate now that the A$87 billion ($81.2 billion) vehicle was beyond its “startup phase.”

In that time the fund, which began investing in June 2007, has moved to a highly diversified position that includes 15.6 per cent in alternatives – where skilled managers are used to take advantage of capital scarcity and market inefficiency through a diverse range of strategies – 4.5 per cent in infrastructure, and 3 per cent in private equity.

In the year to June 30, 2010 the fund has deployed more than 28 per cent of its cash, with alternatives and global equities the main beneficiaries. The alternatives allocation, for instance, has increased from 5 to 15.6 per cent in the past year.

Costello said he will remain in his role for another couple of months, to “facilitate a smooth transition” to a new leader of the Future Fund Management Agency, Melbourne.

The fund’s board of guardians said it already was searching for a replacement, and would look locally and offshore.

Board chairman David Murray paid tribute to Costello, particularly for his role in “recruiting a skilled team to develop and implement the investment program.”

Sponsored Content

From holding an initial $18 billion in a cash account, the fund under chief investment officer, David Neal, now has more than 60 partnerships with global investment managers.

David Murray, chair of the fund’s board of guardians, said cash was deployed into strategies “consistent with our long-term objective”.

Murray said the design of the portfolio meant the fund was less reliant on equity markets to generate returns, than other investors.

During the year the fund moved its debt program, which remains a significant part of the portfolio at 21.9 per cent, away from holdings built opportunistically during the early stages of the credit crisis, to longer-term and higher yielding securities.

Asset Owner:Future Fund

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Why integrated reporting makes sense: Robert Eccles

Robert Eccles has been trying to change the nature of corporate reporting for more than 20 years. He has been an advocate for supplementing financials with information on non-financial factors that are leading indicators of financial results – such as product development, customer satisfaction and the development of intangible assets. The premise is those companies

Opportunities in Europe

Investors and academics agree that political developments in Greece are important because they may shape how financial markets will respond to future political situations in the Eurozone. But according to Olivier Rousseau, the executive director of the FFR, the French pension reserve fund, there is more hype outside of the Eurozone on the implications of

More evidence big is better in pension funds

A pension fund that has 10 times more assets under management has on average 7.67 basis points lower annual investment costs according to a working paper from authors at De Nederlansche Bank, that explores the relationship between pension fund size and investment costs. Written by Dirk Broeders, Arco van Oord and David Rijsbergen the paper

European investment plan requires public private collaboration

The two largest institutional investors in the Netherlands, PGGM and APG, have responded to the European Commission’s investment plan, urging the commission to call on institutional investors to collaborate on the investment proposal. However they also warn that institutional investors are not just a “subsidising entity” and the Juncker Plan is best executed as a

Why Andrew Ang joined Blackrock

Andrew Ang believes factor investing is a more efficient way to organise a portfolio as it allows liquid and illiquid strategies to be managed across the portfolio. It also has the added benefit of honing managers on value creation. He’s been working with a handful of investors while Professor of Finance at Columbia University on

The power of engagement

It is called the “CalPERS’ Effect” but it could easily be called the asset owner effect, or the institutional investor effect, or the power of engagement effect. Wilshire, which is a consultant to the $300 billion Californian fund CalPERS, has provided an update on its study measuring the effect of engagement on a targeted list of companies called the Focus List.

Previous