Funds flow to bonds. Why?

The largest bond manager in the world, PIMCO, is cleaning up. Figures from researcher and data provider eVestment Alliance show that institutional investors put more than twice the amount of money into US fixed-income funds in the past three months than any other asset class.

Notwithstanding the rhetoric of pension funds around the world that they are rebalancing to growth assets, particularly into emerging markets equities, the evidence is they continue to increase their fixed-interest exposures despite historically low yields.

The eVestment report, drawn from pension fund flows across 15 asset classes in major markets, shows that total fund flows into US fixed income was $38 billion in the latest quarter to September. This compared to about $17 billion going into emerging markets equities and another $14 billion into global fixed interest.

US-based global fixed-interest specialist PIMCO, occupied four of the top five positions for funds flows to individual manager funds or strategies. The only other fund in the top five, at number two, was a passive US large-cap equity product from BlackRock.

The two least attractive asset classes for institutional investors during the period were EAFE (Europe Australia and Far East) equities, with minus $20 billion, and all US equities, with minus $26 billion.

While emerging markets enjoyed positive flows, global equities in general did not. The figures show a negative $7 billion flow to global equities and other small negative flows to UK, Japanese and Australian equities. Asia Pacific equities had a positive flow of $5 billion.

Sponsored Content

The popular individual fund for investors’ new money in the period was PIMCO’s ‘Core Plus: Total Return Full Authority’ fund. Short-term bond and cash funds generally suffered net outflows.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous