Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield.

The latest investor trends report from eVestment shows the US foundation and endowment universe to be moving assets out of their largest allocations of US large cap value, core fixed income, large cap growth, interim duration fixed income and core plus fixed income.

As a result of the low-yield environment, these investors are increasing allocations towards cost-effective, passive, global equity exposures and higher-yield and longer duration fixed income. According to the eVestment report, in changing from low and interim duration US fixed income, these investors have allocated to funds which have been increasing their cash positions, reducing their yield to maturity, but also increasing average weighted coupon, portfolio maturity and duration.

Further these investors are favouring strategies that have shifted their portfolios away from AAA to BBB.

“In order to maintain a certain level of yield, they have been forced to move out on the credit spectrum. This is generally true for any non-alternative strategies that have operated with specific return expectations,” the report says.

It also says that allocations to the hedge funds industry have accelerated over the last three quarters.

Sponsored Content

Throughout 2013 there were large inflows to credit and multi-strategy funds and entering 2014 investors have heavily increased allocations to long/short equity and event driven strategies, all of which appear to be at the expense of manage futures and macro strategies.

“With multiple surveys illustrating interest in hedge funds, private equity and real assets, along with what have been large aggregate flows into alternative credit strategies, foundations and endowments have been active in searching for new sources of yield and return credit markets while also attempting to reduce exposure to directional movements in rate markets.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Governance, Gonski style

Since becoming chair of the $80-billion Future Fund in March, David Gonski has set an agenda to act like a public company chair. An element of that vision is to very clearly delegate to management. “The general manager has been elevated to a managing director and the six-monthly announcements will be his,” he says. Another

Risk parity manages risk regret

The risk parity approach to portfolio construction might not deliver results in a “bull stockmarket,” but remained a “robust and rigorous” methodology which also “managed risk regret over time.” These are the views of Wai Lee, chief investment officer of quantitive investment at New York-based fund manager Neuberger Berman, who was recently named winner of

African countries come to the sovereign wealth fund party

Many of the countries with the largest oil reserves also boast the largest sovereign wealth funds (SWFs). And yet African producers, like newcomer Ghana, Angola, and Nigeria which has been pumping oil since the 1950s, haven’t saved much of their oil revenue. Now, in an effort to replicate the long-term growth of funds like Norway’s

Regulatory risk in Europe a factor for infrastructure investment

The head of infrastructure at Australia’s $80 billion Future Fund has cited regulatory risk in Europe and the United Kingdom as reasons to be wary about infrastructure investment in the region. Raphael Arndt, the Future Fund’s head of infrastructure and timberlands, told a Sydney conference this week that he was particularly concerned with the situation

Europe’s credit rating crunch

It has been a bad month for credit-rating agency executives who thought they were winning the legal and regulatory arguments about how they conduct their business. In Australia, the Federal Court ruled on November 5 in favour of 12 local councils in New South Wales which claimed that Standard and Poor’s had misled them into

Dutch reform to tread lightly on investment mix

When the Netherlands pension reforms were announced in 2011, many experts argued they were likely to substantially increase the risk appetites at the funds guarding the country’s $1-trillion pension assets. Recent developments to the reform proposals make the overall impact far from clear, however, suggesting there will be no bonanza for Dutch investment managers. The

Previous