Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield.

The latest investor trends report from eVestment shows the US foundation and endowment universe to be moving assets out of their largest allocations of US large cap value, core fixed income, large cap growth, interim duration fixed income and core plus fixed income.

As a result of the low-yield environment, these investors are increasing allocations towards cost-effective, passive, global equity exposures and higher-yield and longer duration fixed income. According to the eVestment report, in changing from low and interim duration US fixed income, these investors have allocated to funds which have been increasing their cash positions, reducing their yield to maturity, but also increasing average weighted coupon, portfolio maturity and duration.

Further these investors are favouring strategies that have shifted their portfolios away from AAA to BBB.

“In order to maintain a certain level of yield, they have been forced to move out on the credit spectrum. This is generally true for any non-alternative strategies that have operated with specific return expectations,” the report says.

It also says that allocations to the hedge funds industry have accelerated over the last three quarters.

Sponsored Content

Throughout 2013 there were large inflows to credit and multi-strategy funds and entering 2014 investors have heavily increased allocations to long/short equity and event driven strategies, all of which appear to be at the expense of manage futures and macro strategies.

“With multiple surveys illustrating interest in hedge funds, private equity and real assets, along with what have been large aggregate flows into alternative credit strategies, foundations and endowments have been active in searching for new sources of yield and return credit markets while also attempting to reduce exposure to directional movements in rate markets.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Social networks in the investment web

Reels of financial data and analysis coupled with the occasional piece of market gossip or personal hunch are the time-honoured tools investors rely on in building an active portfolio. More recently, an element of sustainability or corporate governance analysis has tried to muscle into the process. Soon there will be another revolutionary option complementing financial

Eijffinger’s decade of financial repression

Financial repression will define the economic landscape for at least another decade, according to professor of financial economics at Tilburg University, Sylvester Eijffinger, which has serious implications for institutional investors. Eijffinger, who also is also a visiting professor at Harvard, sits on the monetary experts panel of the European Union and is an adviser to

Is reviving Europe a suspended apparition?

Getting Europe’s swelling institutional capital to support long-term projects that could benefit its uninspired economies was an idea that sent heads nodding around the continent as it suffered the brunt of the financial crisis. Get pension, insurance and foundation money into where it is most needed with the attraction of reliable long-term cash flows and

Let’s talk about underfunding

Even using the assets of the pension plan was not enough of a leg-up to save the city of Detroit from bankruptcy. As the last words in the song Put your hands up for Detroit by Fedde Le Grand say, it is system shutdown. The fiscal demise of this city may be a lesson for

Johnson urges pension simplicity

There is a David-and-Goliath feeling to the battle Michael Johnson, a research fellow at the London-based think tank the Centre for Policy Studies, is waging against the pension industry. His research, which lays out the case for radically simplifying all aspects of the United Kingdom’s pension sector, has earned him a reputation as a maverick.

Disparity in policy portfolio risk profiles

A policy portfolio is a poor reflection of investor preferences, argued Peter Bernstein. This philosophical question has now been empirically tested by MIT’s Mark Kritzman, who shows the inter-temporal disparity of a policy portfolio’s risk profile. He suggests a simple framework for addressing this deficiency. Kritzman encourages investors to replace rigid policy portfolios with flexible investment policies.

Previous