Farmland comes of age for pension funds

As a relatively new and untapped asset class, farmland remains mysterious to some institutional investors. Greg Bright spoke to Charmion McBride, chief operating officer of Insight Investment, an affiliate manager of BNY Mellon Asset Management, about the benefits of the asset class which include uncorrelated returns and SRI considerations.

There are lots of ironies in pension funds management, with its fondness for categorisation. One is that what is arguably the oldest form of investment – farmland – which followed shortly after the development of the family cave, is considered an alternative asset.

Yet the world still needs farmland, probably more than ever, and now with all the financial packaging that pension funds and other institutional investors demand, there is a growing array of products to capitalise on this very old type of investment.

The beauty of investing in farmland, apart from the obvious connection with the world’s demand for food, is that it represents “real” assets, rather than financial ones, and its correlations with other parts of a portfolio are low.

Charmion McBride, chief operating officer, global farmland at Insight Investment, the big UK-based affiliate manager of BNY Mellon Asset Management says there are three main components to the investment return from farmland: commodity prices; land value appreciation; and active alpha, which includes productivity enhancements.

Sponsored Content

Putting aside the fundamentals, such as about 60 million extra mouths to feed per year in the world at current growth rates, farmland has several attractive characteristics for pension funds.

Clearly, it is a long-term investment, with a 10-year horizon not uncommon. It is a hedge against inflation. And, to the extent that the investment can be benchmarked, it is lowly correlated with equities and bond markets.

London-based McBride says that pension funds she has spoken to who are looking to fit farmland into their portfolio may consider it as either a real estate play, private equity or income-producing investment.

The West Midlands Pension Fund of the UK, tends to see the Insight investment in terms of its sustainability risk budget. The fund has a strong SRI focus.

With Insight’s offering, which is made available via private placement, McBride says that SRI considerations are incorporated both at time of purchase of the asset – farm property or agriculture-related investment – and in ongoing farm management. The manager follows the process developed by the European Initiative for Sustainable Development in Agriculture which recommends a holistic approach to try to balance potentially conflicting issues of food production, profitability, safety, energy efficiency, animal welfare, social responsibility and environmental care.

An interesting aspect of the return dynamics for farmland is that land values tend to hold up, and go up, despite the fluctuations in commodity prices.

From Insight’s perspective, it is not unreasonable for investors to expect a total net return target of 15 per cent a year, unlevered, with income distributions of up to six times a year after about three years.

Diversification comes from geographical spread and commodity range. The manager looks to identify countries with a comparative advantage and farming “partners” which also show an outperformance track record.

The big underlying driver of farmland returns is, of course, the rising demand for food. The production of biofuels will also kick in over the next few years, but the expected growth in the world’s population, coupled with rising living standards in emerging countries, will place steadily increasing pressure on demand.

While continued productivity improvements will take some of the pressure off supply, as they say about land: they are not making any more of it.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous