Equity risk still dominates CalPERS portfolio

CalPERS’ 52 per cent asset allocation to global equities accounts for 69 per cent of its total risk allocation, according to the fund’s risk management update to the end of June.

Similarly, the alternative investment management program has a larger risk allocation than its capital allocation – 20 per cent compared with an actual investment allocation of 14 per cent. Fixed income dramatically brings the total risk down, with a 21 per cent asset allocation but 3 per cent total risk allocation.

According to the risk management quarterly update, presented to the investment committee this week, equity risk is estimated at nearly 90 per cent of total risk and remains the most significant risk in the fund’s asset allocation.

The total fund tracking error is 2.05 per cent, above the budgeted 1.5 per cent, but below the March quarter’s 2.46 per cent.

At 13.4 per cent, total risk is 90 basis points below the March quarter level.

The active allocation risk is 0.5 per cent, down from 0.71 per cent the previous quarter. This is primarily due to a reduction in the global equities overweight position from 3.6 to 2.9 per cent.

Sponsored Content

Liquidity risk also remains a concern for the fund, with the document warning that a sharp correction in risky assets, combined with a credit squeeze, could pose liquidity risks reminiscent of the 2008 financial crisis.

However, the fund has taken a number of steps to minimise this risk, including the implementation of a 4 per cent liquidity portfolio consisting of short- and long-maturity US Treasuries in July this year.

In addition, unfunded commitments in private equity and real estate are nearly half the size of the 2008 levels; and the securities lending reinvestment portfolio is much smaller and has a lower leverage limit compared to the cash collateral.

With regard to risk management, the CalPERS’ investment committee also has plans to complete the testing and go live with its new risk management system, Barra, and conduct a board risk management workshop in the Fall.

Meanwhile, the separate risk management committee, established in April 2011, has produced a “top risk” list across the fund, with the CalPERS Pension System Resumption (PSR) system, and investment controls and systems ranking as the two highest residual risks facing the fund.

The fund is implementing a new CFO function and enhancing investment accounting policies, which among other things aim to mitigate this investment risk.

The PSR – which will replace 49 systems for managing member enrolments, benefits and contributions – is expected to remain a high risk until it is fully implemented. It is already 18 months overdue.

The committee reports that work is also underway to develop quantitative risk measures and a relational database to house the assessments, allowing for real-time reports.

It is also recruiting for new positions in the risk intelligence office.

 

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

What does an effective board look like?

Pension fund boards are complex, evolving, collective bodies and the individuals that serve them face unique challenges. The Rotman-ICPM Board Effectiveness Program is a week-long course designed specifically for pension fund trustees that showcases how an effective board looks and behaves. Pension management beneficiaries are delegating to a body that then delegates to an executive,

ESG rethink can add 40 basis points per month: Hermes

Rigorous Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) management can deliver an extra 40 basis points per month according to Saker Nusseibeh, CEO and head of investment at Hermes Fund Managers. “Where it [ESG] really matters for performance is in consistently avoiding bad governance. You can add 40 basis points per month… Per month!” Nusseibeh told a

International reaction to QSuper’s innovation

Australian fund, QSuper’s creation of eight different investment cohorts for its 440,000 default fund members this month has sparked curiosity and admiration from defined contribution experts in the US, the UK and New Zealand. The investment strategies for each group will be focussed on an estimated retirement outcome for that segment, taking into account the

Investors ignore liability matching at their peril

Two high profile pension funds, ATP of Denmark and HOOPP of Canada, have been very successful in managing their assets in two distinct portfolios. But the practice of fund separation, a portion of the portfolio for liability hedging and another for alpha generation, is not common in pension management. It should be. For these two

Home bias in corporate engagement revealed

Investors should take care in selecting corporate engagement firms to ensure the engagement reflects their portfolio holdings, warn academics at Oxford and Maastricht Universities following a new study which reveals a home bias in such activity. As the investment portfolios of large institutional investors become increasingly global, it is particularly important that they carefully select

The power of benchmarking: GRESB comes of age

Now in its fifth year GRESB, the benchmark that measures the sustainability performance of real estate portfolios, has been influential in changing the sector’s performance and environmental impact. Now Nils Kok, executive director of GRESB and associate professor in finance at Maastricht University, says that infrastructure and private equity assets are ripe for a benchmark

Previous