Emerging and frontier markets continue darling run

Global equity markets significantly underperformed emerging and frontier markets in 2010, evidenced by MSCI Indices end of  year data, with some emerging markets returning as much as 50 per cent and some frontier markest returning 70 per cent for the year.While overall global equity markets continued to recover, the MSCI data demonstrated that emerging and frontier markets recovered more strongly than developed markets in 2010.

The MSCI Thailand and MSCI Peru indices were the strongest performers among the emerging markets, posting returns of 49.9 per cent and 47.8 per cent respectively. While within this market segment, the MSCI Hungary index was ranked the poorest performer, with a return of -12.0 per cent with the MSCI Czech Republic index coming in next with a -11.0 per cent return.

Frontier markets made a comeback in 2010 after significantly lagging behind developed and emerging markets in 2009 with a return of 7.0 per cent. Overall they more than doubled this, posting a return of 18.3 per cent.

The MSCI Sri Lanka index was the top performer for frontier markets, posting a 73.2 per cent return, with the MSCI Bahrain index last among the frontier classification with a return of -23.0 per cent.

Within developed markest the US index returned 13.21 per cent, outperforming the European index which suffered due to the sovereign debt crisis. Despite that, Sweden was named the top performing index among developed markets, posting a return of 29.0 per cent.

The MSCI global small cap indexes repeated the success of 2009 in outperforming the MSCI global standard (large + mid cap) indexes across all regions. The MSCI small cap index outpaced its large and mid cap counterpart, MSCI ACWI, by more than 10 percentage points, posting returns of 23.2 per cent compared to MSCI ACWI’s return of 9.7 per cent. The large cap indices have a challenge in the coming year if it is to prevent the MSCI global small cap indices from completing an outperformance hat trick in the coming year.

Sponsored Content

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

The cost of bad asset allocation

A study of 300 US pension funds by CEM Benchmarking reinforces the importance of asset allocation, highlighting the performance of asset classes, as well as new evidence on correlations between asset classes. Alex Beath, author of the study, discusses the implications for asset allocation with Amanda White. A CEM Benchmarking study “Asset Allocation and Fund

The OECD’s plan for long-term investment

G20 financial ministers and central bank governors welcomed the findings of the G20/OECD roundtable on institutional investors and long-term investment last month, which included clear plans to incentivise institutional investors to undertake more long-term investments. The roundtable, “From solutions to actions: implementing measures to encourage institutional long-term investment financing”, held in Singapore recognised that long-term

Why long-horizon investors should adopt factor-based asset allocation

Long-horizon investors can withstand macro-economic volatility and so should tilt towards strategies that are exposed to that, including value, small cap and momentum. Oleg Ruban, vice president in the applied research team at MSCI says this validates factor-investing and factor-based asset allocation for these investors.   Appropriate asset allocation requires explicit attention be paid to

The case for long-termism

Keith Ambachtsheer’s lead article in the Fall 2014 edition of the Rotman International Journal of Pension Management, takes readers through an historical and logical journey that supports the case for long-termism. Importantly he validates this with four high-profile investor case studies which demonstrate that a long-term view benefits society but also the investors, willing to

Investors alter allocations because of climate risks

A number of large institutional investors, including AP1, the Environment Agency and AustralianSuper, made changes to their strategic asset allocation as a result of Mercer’s 2011 study on climate risks, and now the consultant is working with a new raft of investors to assess forward-looking climate change scenarios against their current allocations. Meanwhile one of

Real estate sector continues to lead on sustainability: GRESB

This year’s Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark (GRESB) reveals that sustainability reporting has improved in coverage and quality of data, with the average overall score increasing due to increasing implementation and measurement. The average score is now 47 (out of 100) which is up nine points this year. The benchmark collects data from 637 listed

Previous