Dutch reforms ‘flawed’, warns Ambachtsheer

The pension thought-leadership mantle held by The Netherlands has been called into question by the new Dutch pension accord, according to commentary in the latest Ambachtsheer Letter, which details perceived design flaws in the accord.The Ambachtsheer Letter, a periodic commentary piece by KPA Advisory Services’ Keith Ambachtsheer, questions the more practical elements of the reform implementation including the difficulty in establishing a ‘collective risk profile’ for a group of pension plan members who have very different risk profiles.

It also argues it is unrealistic to expect plan participants to understand the key elements of the pension deal, which is arguably more complicated than the old one.

Ambachtsheer, who is also director of the International Centre for Pension Management, details three specific concerns regarding the Dutch pension reform, and goes on to discuss how to overcome these.

He says the Dutch accord has two distinct pension system goals – affordable pension adequacy and strong payment surety – that require separate risk-taking and risk-shedding instruments.

TIAA-CREF in the US is an example of how this structure can work, he says.

If the Dutch occupational hybrid defined contribution/defined benefit system is to move towards a structure that offers separate risk-seeking and risk-shedding investment options, then setting investment defaults becomes an important part of pension design.

Sponsored Content

Connected with this is the growing importance of the quality of the data about individual members.

The Dutch pension reform outlines five goals, to be achieved through eight specific measures, and Ambachtsheer argues that some of those measures need to be changed if the accord’s “laudable goal of continued pension solidarity in the Netherlands is to be realised”.

The Dutch pension system has been ranked number one in the world by the Melbourne-Mercer Global Pension Index.

“When the Dutch decide to make major changes to their pension system, the rest of the world should pay attention,” Ambachtsheer says.

He also says the accord, which contains specific measures intended to enhance the efficiency, sustainability, fairness and transparency of its hybrid DC/DB pension plans, is worth studying to determine whether it is likely to achieve its goals, and the application to other systems.

 

For more information on the The Ambachtsheer Letter visit www.kpa-advisory.com.

 

A memorandum, by the organisation representing both employers and employees in the Netherlands, Stichting van de Arbeid, detailing the pension accord can be accessed here

Memorandum detailing the Dutch Pension Accord

 

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

NEST’s flexible default pension

The workplace pension asked its members what they wanted during the decumulation phase. The answers led to a default product that aims for assurances in older age, while still offering options.

Markets main fear for CIOs: survey

Asset owners are lowering return targets, shrinking active long-only allocations and getting tough on fees as harsh outlooks persist, the annual Top1000funds.com/Casey Quirk survey reveals.

Future Fund adds risk for short term

The CIO of Australia's sovereign wealth fund has added risk to the portfolio showing optimism about the short-term outlook but remains cautious about the medium and long term.

The lasting impact of pension nudges

Choices people make when they enter defined-contribution schemes tend not to change, even after fraud allegations, a paper from behavioural economist Richard Thaler and other academics states.

Pensions add $4.8 trillion in 2017

Pension assets grew by nearly $5 trillion last year and the hottest markets were Australia, Chile and Hong Kong. Go inside the numbers of The Thinking Ahead Institute’s annual pension report.

Ambachtsheer calls for CFA update

Pension fund adviser Keith Ambachtsheer says the industry-leading CFA credential program needs to be more focused on the future – starting with an update to outdated reference materials.

Previous