DB plans continue to slide

The funded status of US defined-benefit corporate-pension plans continued to worsen last year, despite plan sponsors increasing contributions by $70 billion, a new Mercer study reveals.

Mercer found funding levels have slipped to 2009 levels, with the outlook for 2012 likely to extend the bleak news for plan sponsors.

The funded status of pension plans sponsored by companies in the S&P 1500 declined from 81 per cent at the end of 2010 to 75 per cent by the end of 2011. Funded status continued to decline in 2012 as these plans hit a record low of 70 per cent as of July 31, representing a shortfall of $689 billion.

 

Low growth, high volatility

Eric Veletzos, principal and consulting actuary with Mercer’s retirement, risk and finance business, puts the blame for the continuing slide in funded status on the low-returns environment coupled with record-low interest rates.

Sponsored Content

“Liability growth exceeded asset returns for the fourth consecutive year, offsetting these contributions,” Veletzos says.

The median asset return for 2011 was 2.9 per cent, down from 12.1 per cent in 2010 and 18.5 per cent in 2009.

Meanwhile, the median pension liability grew by 13.7 per cent in 2011, the third consecutive year with liability growth in excess of 10 per cent.

The high liability rate of growth is driven by decreasing interest rates.

 

Stacking up risk

Mercer’s research paper, How Does Your Retirement Program Stack Up, bases analysis on information contained in the 10-K reports filed by companies in the S&P 1500 for the 2011 fiscal year.

The figures reveal that the prevalence of what Mercer describes as “risky” plans in the S&P 1500 increased from 4.7 per cent during 2001, an increase of nearly 70 per cent.

“These plans are poorly funded and more material compared to the size of the corporations, so pension risk is a major issue for these organisations,” he says.

The tough environment is reflected in the expectations of plan sponsors, with Mercer noting median expected return had declined marginally from 7.92 per cent to 7.73 per cent by the end of 2011.

Part of this can be explained by a general trend among corporate defined-benefit plans to gradually de-risk their investments away from high-risk assets, such as equities, to fixed-income investments.

Mercer is seeing a range of strategies from funds aimed at controlling the volatility of their funded status. These include liability-driven investing and other risk-management strategies.

The consultant is also seeing increased interest in risk-transfer strategies such as lump-sum cash-outs and annuitisation.

Ford and General Motors are two recent high profile examples of corporate-pension plans that have looked to transfer risk to a third party. This trend is expected to gather pace in the coming years.

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Misaligned incentives, bank mismanagement and troubling policy implications

This paper by New York University’s Jonas Prager outlines the major changes in the financial structure as well as the focal events that characterised the 2007-2008 global financial crisis and considers the evidence for the crucial role played by misaligned incentives. Misaligned incentives, bank mismanagement, and troubling policy implications mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Previous