Climate change expert upbeat on post-Copenhagen opportunities

Global head of climate change investment research at DB Climate Change Advisors, Mark Fulton, has a contrary view to most observers, post-Copenhagen. He spoke to Amanda White about the climate change market and the asset allocation implications for investors.


Most analysis post-Copenhagen has concentrated on the seeming lack of tangible results – no legally binding agreement or an agreed emission reductions target – inferring negative connotations only.

But the climate change investment group at DB Climate Change Advisors, led by Mark Fulton, has more of a “glass half-full” perspective citing the countries that are the largest emitters agreeing to take action as a positive step.

“Very few people expected a legally binding deal, and to come out with an accord where the largest emitters are signed up, that is positive,” Fulton says.

Fulton believes there is never going to be an accord that is a one-size-fits-all and concedes there is some disappointment there was no hard emissions target in the developed world. He still supports the view that a carbon market is a necessary development.

But he stresses investors need to remain very focused on what drives markets, and that local level and country level targets are the key to that.

Sponsored Content

Despite the lack of results at Copenhagen, Fulton contends there are still plenty of opportunities for investors who take a global view.

DB Advisors produced a global tracker document last year, which included an aggregate risk rating of countries based on key mandates and supporting policy frameworks. The belief is that investors will become increasingly concerned about regulatory risk, and countries that deploy a transparent, long-lived, comprehensive and consistent set of policies will attract global capital.

According to the report China, Germany, France and Australia all have lower risk profiles for climate change investments because their governments have strong incentives in place, along with a consistent approach.

Notably the US, UK and Canada are moderate risk as they rely on a more volatile market incentive approach, and in the case of the US have suffered a stop-start approach in some areas, such as the production tax credit.

“For a global investor there are plenty of good, well-constructed policies creating markets and driving capital,” Fulton says.

DB’s mantra when it comes to climate change investing is that investors want transparency, longevity and certainty.

In its latest report, examining asset allocation implications, DB argues that climate change investment is growing rapidly relative to the broader market, providing a distinct and identifiable source of alpha.

The report also outlines a strategic asset allocation to consider climate change as part of portfolio construction. It uses an aggressive overweight of a 6 per cent allocation to climate change sectors, compared to a 2 per cent global market capitalisation weight.

It concludes, conservatively, that an ongoing assumption would be a 5 per cent excess return for climate change sectors, which would give an additional 0.4 per cent to the total portfolio.

For large investors the easiest way to access climate change opportunities has been through private equity and venture capital in the form of new technology and climate change technology investments.

However Fulton sees many opportunities in other asset classes including infrastructure and the lesser recognised public equities.

He believes there will be a lot of development within energy and water and expects to see a proliferation of renewable infrastructure funds.

DB estimates in the next five to 10 years there will be more than $10 trillion of investment in infrastructure with more than half going to water.

Within portfolios, DB Advisors tends to look at climate change as a theme when analysing potential investments, rather than a sector.

“Sometimes clean tech is the closest thing to a sector, but it’s really a smaller subset of climate change, the difference is we see climate change as having more agriculture in it,” he says.

“Overall we see climate change as a theme in the major asset classes and you can create specific strategy or product or see it as an investment factor.”

Within its own equities team Deutsche has made a carbon risk management analytical tool, provided by RiskMetrics, available to portfolio managers through its platform.

DB hasn’t published any research on the carbon beta tilt, but Fulton quotes research by Innovest, now owned by RiskMetrics, that shows a positive effect on returns.

He is also aware a lot of investors are taking a wait and see approach, conceding there is not a deep product market yet.

However DB is making significant inroads in order to make investors more comfortable, including the development in February of a clean tech index in conjunction with NASDAQ.

The index is comprised of 110 companies identified by DB from a global universe of more than 4,000 that have at least a third of revenues derived from clean technology, that have investable geographies and exchanges identified by NASDAQ QMX.

The index has a price return and a total return version.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

What does an effective board look like?

Pension fund boards are complex, evolving, collective bodies and the individuals that serve them face unique challenges. The Rotman-ICPM Board Effectiveness Program is a week-long course designed specifically for pension fund trustees that showcases how an effective board looks and behaves. Pension management beneficiaries are delegating to a body that then delegates to an executive,

ESG rethink can add 40 basis points per month: Hermes

Rigorous Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) management can deliver an extra 40 basis points per month according to Saker Nusseibeh, CEO and head of investment at Hermes Fund Managers. “Where it [ESG] really matters for performance is in consistently avoiding bad governance. You can add 40 basis points per month… Per month!” Nusseibeh told a

International reaction to QSuper’s innovation

Australian fund, QSuper’s creation of eight different investment cohorts for its 440,000 default fund members this month has sparked curiosity and admiration from defined contribution experts in the US, the UK and New Zealand. The investment strategies for each group will be focussed on an estimated retirement outcome for that segment, taking into account the

Investors ignore liability matching at their peril

Two high profile pension funds, ATP of Denmark and HOOPP of Canada, have been very successful in managing their assets in two distinct portfolios. But the practice of fund separation, a portion of the portfolio for liability hedging and another for alpha generation, is not common in pension management. It should be. For these two

Home bias in corporate engagement revealed

Investors should take care in selecting corporate engagement firms to ensure the engagement reflects their portfolio holdings, warn academics at Oxford and Maastricht Universities following a new study which reveals a home bias in such activity. As the investment portfolios of large institutional investors become increasingly global, it is particularly important that they carefully select

The power of benchmarking: GRESB comes of age

Now in its fifth year GRESB, the benchmark that measures the sustainability performance of real estate portfolios, has been influential in changing the sector’s performance and environmental impact. Now Nils Kok, executive director of GRESB and associate professor in finance at Maastricht University, says that infrastructure and private equity assets are ripe for a benchmark

Previous