Climate change expert upbeat on post-Copenhagen opportunities

Global head of climate change investment research at DB Climate Change Advisors, Mark Fulton, has a contrary view to most observers, post-Copenhagen. He spoke to Amanda White about the climate change market and the asset allocation implications for investors.


Most analysis post-Copenhagen has concentrated on the seeming lack of tangible results – no legally binding agreement or an agreed emission reductions target – inferring negative connotations only.

But the climate change investment group at DB Climate Change Advisors, led by Mark Fulton, has more of a “glass half-full” perspective citing the countries that are the largest emitters agreeing to take action as a positive step.

“Very few people expected a legally binding deal, and to come out with an accord where the largest emitters are signed up, that is positive,” Fulton says.

Fulton believes there is never going to be an accord that is a one-size-fits-all and concedes there is some disappointment there was no hard emissions target in the developed world. He still supports the view that a carbon market is a necessary development.

But he stresses investors need to remain very focused on what drives markets, and that local level and country level targets are the key to that.

Sponsored Content

Despite the lack of results at Copenhagen, Fulton contends there are still plenty of opportunities for investors who take a global view.

DB Advisors produced a global tracker document last year, which included an aggregate risk rating of countries based on key mandates and supporting policy frameworks. The belief is that investors will become increasingly concerned about regulatory risk, and countries that deploy a transparent, long-lived, comprehensive and consistent set of policies will attract global capital.

According to the report China, Germany, France and Australia all have lower risk profiles for climate change investments because their governments have strong incentives in place, along with a consistent approach.

Notably the US, UK and Canada are moderate risk as they rely on a more volatile market incentive approach, and in the case of the US have suffered a stop-start approach in some areas, such as the production tax credit.

“For a global investor there are plenty of good, well-constructed policies creating markets and driving capital,” Fulton says.

DB’s mantra when it comes to climate change investing is that investors want transparency, longevity and certainty.

In its latest report, examining asset allocation implications, DB argues that climate change investment is growing rapidly relative to the broader market, providing a distinct and identifiable source of alpha.

The report also outlines a strategic asset allocation to consider climate change as part of portfolio construction. It uses an aggressive overweight of a 6 per cent allocation to climate change sectors, compared to a 2 per cent global market capitalisation weight.

It concludes, conservatively, that an ongoing assumption would be a 5 per cent excess return for climate change sectors, which would give an additional 0.4 per cent to the total portfolio.

For large investors the easiest way to access climate change opportunities has been through private equity and venture capital in the form of new technology and climate change technology investments.

However Fulton sees many opportunities in other asset classes including infrastructure and the lesser recognised public equities.

He believes there will be a lot of development within energy and water and expects to see a proliferation of renewable infrastructure funds.

DB estimates in the next five to 10 years there will be more than $10 trillion of investment in infrastructure with more than half going to water.

Within portfolios, DB Advisors tends to look at climate change as a theme when analysing potential investments, rather than a sector.

“Sometimes clean tech is the closest thing to a sector, but it’s really a smaller subset of climate change, the difference is we see climate change as having more agriculture in it,” he says.

“Overall we see climate change as a theme in the major asset classes and you can create specific strategy or product or see it as an investment factor.”

Within its own equities team Deutsche has made a carbon risk management analytical tool, provided by RiskMetrics, available to portfolio managers through its platform.

DB hasn’t published any research on the carbon beta tilt, but Fulton quotes research by Innovest, now owned by RiskMetrics, that shows a positive effect on returns.

He is also aware a lot of investors are taking a wait and see approach, conceding there is not a deep product market yet.

However DB is making significant inroads in order to make investors more comfortable, including the development in February of a clean tech index in conjunction with NASDAQ.

The index is comprised of 110 companies identified by DB from a global universe of more than 4,000 that have at least a third of revenues derived from clean technology, that have investable geographies and exchanges identified by NASDAQ QMX.

The index has a price return and a total return version.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous