CalSTRS to vote on tactical asset shift, new “innovation portfolio”

The US$161 billion California State Teachers’ Retirement System (CalSTRS) is set to vote next week on a proposal which would see $6 billion tactically invested in the debt markets, as well as the conception of a new “innovation portfolio”.

 

CalSTRS’ consultant, Pension Consulting Alliance, has recommended the fund adopt the change as part of a tweaking of the strategic asset allocation.

The investment committee will decide on March 5 whether to accept the new strategic asset allocation, which would see the global equities allocation reduced by 5 per cent ($6 billion), and the assets spread across fixed income, real estate and private equity.

“In the wake of the current financial crisis, staff and PCA have suggested the investment committee consider an opportunistic move into debt instruments that currently offer equity-like returns due to the lack of capital in the financial market,” the board said.

Sponsored Content

If approved, the fund will invest in “solid securities from distressed sellers”; opportunities in distressed priced debt, high-yield bonds and other categories that have an expected return of 15 per cent or greater.

As a tactical investment strategy, it will only continue to exist as long as the current capital crisis continues.

Approximately $1 billion, already in CalSTRS’ investment holdings, has been earmarked for the program. The existing pipeline of opportunities for consideration is about $3.5 billion.

“Given the unprecedented nature of this recession, staff and PCA believe CalSTRS should not try to pick the bottom in the equity market, but rather shift an allocation from global equity and allocate those assets across the remaining three asset classes to take advantage of the unique opportunity,” the board said.

In addition, the investment committee will vote on a new “innovation portfolio” which would invest in opportunities that fall outside the traditional asset classes currently used by the board.

The proposed allocation would not exceed 1.5 per cent of the total fund, or $2 billion, and would be used by staff to incubate new investment opportunities that could help improve the risk-adjusted returns of the investment portfolio.

The investments within the innovation portfolio would be required to demonstrate success before larger dollar amounts are committed to a specific strategy. Within three years, CalSTRS would decide if a strategy should be dedicated to a new asset class, be included in one of the traditional asset classes, or be terminated.

The minimum return objective for the portfolio is 90-day Treasury Bills plus 300 basis points, and the size of each individual strategy would be limited to a maximum of 0.5 per cent of the total fund’s market value.

CalSTRS plans to revisit the fund’s asset targets and ranges again during its asset liability study this year.

Table: Proposed revised strategic asset allocation

Asset class Allocation weight change Revised allocation weight
Global equity -5% 55%
Fixed income +1% 21%
Real estate +2% 13%
Private equity +2% 11%
Cash 0%

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous