CalSTRS expands active/passive decision making

CalSTRS will double the ranges of its active/passive global equities allocations in a bid to enable investment staff to allocate funds tactically across active and passive rather than be forced to rebalance to strategic asset allocations.


At the February investment committee meeting, CalSTRS concluded its active/passive review of global equities and fixed income — which took nearly nine months — recommending moving the active/passive bands for the US and non-US segments of the global equity portfolio to 10 per cent, while keeping fixed income at the same ranges.

According to a staff report to the investment committee, endorsed by consultant PCA, staff found the 5 per cent range for the non-US portfolio restrictive during times of extreme market conditions..

The report says during the past 18 months the global equities portfolio has periodically “bumped up” against the current ranges which has the potential to force portfolio movements at points that would not be opportune within the market environment.

“This modest level of increased staff discretion will provide the flexibility necessary for staff to shift assets deliberately rather than having the current ranges dictate asset allocation decisions. The expanded ranges will be an important tool used to add alpha in the global equity portfolio by enabling staff to position the portfolio more tactically which, in turn, will broaden the opportunity set.”

The active/passive study has been presented over three investment committee meetings beginning in September 2009 and the latest presentation included a comparison of how other large plans were positioned.

Sponsored Content

Information obtained by Pension Data Exchange and from questionnaires sent to peers showed most US equities were passively managed when viewed in aggregate, while public pension funds favoured active management in non-US equities, with almost 75 per cent of the funds having a higher allocation to active than passive.

The global equities and fixed income portfolios make up about 75 per cent of the fund assets.

 

CalSTRS active/passive mix – global equities

Current range  Proposed range

US passive  65-75%  60-80%

US active  25-35%  20-40%

Non-US passive  45-55% 40-60%

Non-US active  45-55%  40-60%

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Is the financial services sector serving the public interest?

Fiduciary law, which creates the boundaries and rules for asset owners managing other people’s money, is evolving. The short-termism, misaligned incentives and complex and over-supply of services that characterises financial services, is under fire. Regulators around the world are increasingly looking at how to change the behaviour and supply chain dynamics in the industry, and

The impact of the mega manager

The impact of size is a delicate point for asset managers. For specialist asset classes, and boutique managers, being small and nimble can be a source of alpha. On the other hand, being large can reduce fees and increase innovation and product offering. But now there is evidence to show that the emergence of the

The contested role of asset consultants

Asset consultants are a key part of the investment chain, providing small funds with services that include decision making processes and strategic asset allocation, and for larger funds traditionally playing a key role in manager and strategy selection. But a study by Gordon Clark and Ashby Monk, which is part of a broader look by

Demystifying private equity

US public pension funds, on average, have around 9.4 per cent allocated to private equity but for many public funds monitoring the firms that manage these investments – including the transparency of underlying investments, fees, performance and benchmarking – as well justifying these investments to boards and stakeholders, takes up more than 10 per cent

Why investors employ smart beta strategies

The common view is smart beta is used to side step expensive active equity managers or hedge fund managers whose processes are on the surface opaque, but on close investigation turn out to be largely beta like in approach. As investors have gained experience and familiarity they have also learnt about how it offers greater

Managing culture with risk management techniques

The interaction between governance, culture and performance is increasingly a topic around asset owner board tables. But little has been written about the relationship between culture and the financial crisis, and how to change culture in financial services organisations. Andrew Lo, professor of finance at MIT, has come up with a proposal to change culture

Previous