CalSTRS cost breakdown supports internal savings…

A breakdown of CalSTRS’ investment costs confirms the cost savings of internal asset management, with the fund’s internal asset management costs making up only 0.07 per cent of the total portfolio management costs, but comprising 30 per cent of the total assets managed.

In a presentation to the board at a meeting this week, chief investment officer Christopher Ailman reveals the total cost of managing the $135 billion CalSTRS portfolio is $174 million a year, with only $12.5 million of that spent on internal asset management.

“Internal management of the assets is considerably less expensive than external management. As a basic rule, over the past five years, it costs about one tenth the cost to manage assets internally compared to externally. As the plan continues to grow, staff and the investment committee should look for opportunities where assets can be competitively managed by internal staff rather than external managers.”

According to a breakdown of CalSTRS’ management fees versus a peer group’s median cost, the fund saved about 11.5 basis points on the global equity portfolio by managing it in-house. The highest savings were in US small cap active, where the saving was 41.3 basis points, and US large cap active where the saving was 24 basis points.

Reducing costs is one of the three core objectives of the fund in this fiscal year, and savings have already been made in both internal and external asset management costs.

Sponsored Content

The investments branch is set to achieve nearly 25 per cent savings, achieved through salary savings and expense reduction – including spending 7 per cent less on salaries, although this is partly due to staff vacancies – while renegotiation of external fees has resulted in an 8.5 per cent reduction in fees paid to external managers.

According to the report every global equity manager except one has been willing to renegotiate and lower their fees.

Despite the cost reductions, Ailman said overall the cost structure of the fund had risen. He said in line with other large funds, the complexity and specialisation of larger funds that have more complex asset allocation has resulted in higher costs.

The team will discuss the long-term financial plan and cost of the portfolio at a July business plan meeting.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

CFA to lead industry out of crisis

Protecting the pension system is one of six key themes at the centre of the CFA Institute’s Future of Finance initiative as it aims to empower the investment industry to take leadership in restoring trust. Speaking at the sixty-sixth annual CFA Institute conference in Singapore this week, president and chief executive of the CFA Institute,

Tail risk parity, V 1.0

Just when you thought you were safe, the next reiteration of risk parity has arrived. AllianceBernstein’s tail risk parity takes the concept of risk parity, reallocating assets uniformly according to risk, but it uses tail risk, not volatility, as the core measure. The concept of risk parity is a portfolio diversified according to risk, rather

Retirement: a cause worth working on

There are two things that drive the newly appointed global chief operating officer of State Street Global Advisors, Greg Ehret, in his bid to improve the client experience: the retirement business is a cause worth working on and the clients are the reason the business exists. Ehret was appointed to the new position at SSgA,

Pension funds, where banks no longer go?

There continues to be potential for pension capital appearing where bank lending no longer wants to go. Commentators in the UK and continental Europe have heightened expectations that pension funds will step in to help fill the continent’s bank financing gap. Societe Generale, for instance, recently predicted further “disintermediation” by investors sidestepping banks and looking

Building consensus for investment beliefs at CalPERS

An investment-beliefs workshop for the CalPERS board, held in April, revealed five areas, including active management, where the views of the board and staff lacked consensus. The contentious, or unsettled, topics for discussion were active management, private asset classes, sustainability (environmental, social and governance), investment performance targets and stakeholder considerations. At the board workshop, Janine

Behind PGGM’s ESG index

In 2010 PGGM conducted a study to see if it was possible to reduce the number of companies it invested in from 4000 to 400, based on its environmental, social and governance leanings, and still maintain it’s beta risk/return profile. The idea was that the €133-billion ($174-billion) fund would better know and understand what it

Previous