CalSTRS boosts infrastructure exposure

The unique pension fund-owned structure of Industry Funds Management contributed to it winning a large infrastructure mandate from the $144.8 billion CalSTRS, whose risk-based view of the world has it looking for inflation-hedging diversification.

IFM, which is owned by 32 not-for-profit Australian pension funds, has been awarded a mandate of up to $500 million from the California fund to invest in a diversified portfolio of core infrastructure assets in North America and Europe.

IFM was a pioneer in infrastructure investing in Australia, investing since 1994. It has been investing globally since 2004 when it first bought a stake in Arqiva, the UK broadcasting towers.

Its portfolio now also includes the largest heating and distribution company in Poland, Dalkia, power utilities in the US and Germany and water and gas utilities in the UK.

For CalSTRS, which is relatively new to infrastructure investing, it addresses the goal for greater diversification in areas that would also serve as a hedge against inflation.

Inflation risk is one of six core factor risks for the fund, as part of its new approach to portfolio construction, which involves overlaying the risks across the portfolio.

Sponsored Content

The other risk factors are global economic growth, interest rate risk, liquidity, leverage and investment governance risk.

The fund’s target asset allocation at the end of December was a 2 per cent allocation to inflation-sensitive assets.

It also had a 1 per cent allocation to cash, 12 per cent allocation to private equity, 12 per cent allocation to real estate, 20 per cent to fixed income and 53 per cent to global equity.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

A sustainable financial system on the agenda at Davos

The United Nations Environment Programme’s Inquiry into the Design of a Sustainable Financial System will present its interim report in Davos this week. The report has been initiated to advance policy options to improve the financial system’s effectiveness in mobilising capital towards a green and inclusive economy, and the interim report profiles innovations in five

Do pension funds add value?

Asset owners, on average, add 15 basis points of value above their asset class benchmarks after fees, according to an extensive study by CEM Benchmarking. The survey, which measured 6,666 data points from a global set of defined benefit plans, and some sovereign wealth funds and buffer funds, from 1992-2013. Gross of investment fees, funds

OECD calls for policy solution to long term investing barriers

Governance of institutional investors and the lengthening investment chain causing  bigger distances between assets’ beneficial owners and those involved in executing investment strategies was one of three practical issues raised by the OECD general secretary as a barrier to more investment in long-term investing financing. Speaking at the OECD Project on Institutional Investors and Long-term

2014: the year in words

In 2014 we have delivered to our readers more than 200 in-depth investor profiles, analytical and research-driven stories on the global institutional investment universe.  The most popular investment stories have been about private equity, ESG integration and how to find the ever-elusive alpha. But asset owners have also liked stories on how to improve their

Traditional risk measures flawed

The traditional method of using aggregated monthly data to measure long run risk is flawed and inaccurate, according to important new research by State Street. Co-authors David Turkington, Will Kinlaw and Mark Kritzman have found that there is a huge divergence in risk and return over long periods, which is not visible when using measures

Divestment of fossil fuels inappropriate for Norway’s SWF: expert group

Automatic exclusion of coal or petroleum producers is not an effective way for the Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund of addressing climate issues, according the report of the expert group on investments in coal and petroleum to the Norwegian Ministry of Finance. “We believe the use of the Fund as a climate policy instrument beyond what

Previous