CalPERS undertakes large-scale board reforms

CalPERS is undertaking sweeping changes to the way its board operates as part of a package of governance reforms to be rolled out in the coming year.

The comprehensive governance project, led by board president Rob Feckner (pictured), includes a clearer delineation between the role of executive staff and the board in day-to-day management; an overhaul of reporting to the board; and a closer link between performance and compensation.

The reforms were instigated in August and the fund has been working with Funston Advisory Services, which conducted a detailed study this year on the fund’s governance practices.

The report was completed in September and contains several initiatives already agreed to by the CalPERS board designed to: “further strengthen the accountability, efficiency, transparency and ethics at the nation’s largest public pension fund”.

The changes strengthens the position of the chief executive and chief investment officer, with the number of senior staff reporting directly to the board halved to just these two executives.

The chief investment officer retains investment autonomy and authority to hire, fire and decide the compensation of investment staff.

Sponsored Content

Staff compensation processes will be streamlined, with the board focusing on the whether staff are meeting agreed benchmarks and objectives of the fund.

“The board will evaluate direct report performance and compensation based on the agreed-upon strategy, performance outcomes and metrics, not just activities,” the Funston report says.

In addition, executives to the level of senior portfolio managers will be required to certify annually in writing that they have been free from undue influence from “individual board member, executive or third party”.

The governance reforms will also see some crucial investment decisions made behind closed doors.

The board and/or its committees will establish closed sessions where it will meet selected executives who report regularly to the board, or to make significant investment decisions.

The board will develop a “confidentiality policy” that applies to what the report describes as “personnel matters, contract negotiations and sensitive investment information”.

Disciplinary action will be taken against staff, board members or external parties who breach the policy.

Along with these changes, the CalPERS board will also undergo a more rigorous assessment of its performance. This will include self-assessment and assessment by an independent third party. The assessment will also take into account evaluation from staff.

The reform process has also formalised the different roles of the executive team and the board.

 

“The board will continue to further improve the effectiveness and efficiency of its governance processes by increasing their focus on important strategic issues and reducing the number and length of committee meetings and the amount of time devoted to board matters,” the report says.

“This would help minimize unnecessary board involvement in operational matters.”

The committee structure of the board has been changed, with a specific governance committee charged with managing the ongoing reform process.

The fund has also consolidated the various responsibilities of the benefits and program administration committee into other committees, cutting the number of committees by one.

The new committee structure will take effect at the beginning of 2012.

The board will also undertake an annual report into its effectiveness and performance, as well as undertake a more focused self-development program.

The program has also laid out a number of processes outlined to improve the formulation and direction of the agenda items for committees and the board.

This will cover how the board is kept appraised of escalating issues, as well as streamline how committees and the board interact.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

SWFs eye offshore deals after quiet Q1

Hurt by mark-to-market losses and exercising caution in the face of an unforgiving investment environment, sovereign wealth funds (SWFs) made only 26 investments, worth $6.8 billion, in the first quarter of 2009 – their lowest deployment of capital since the fourth quarter of 2005. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Caisse pulls out of risky real estate after $5 billion write-down

Canada’s largest pension fund manager, the C$120 billion ($108 billion) Caisse de depot et placement du Quebec, has restructured its real estate group and ceased investing in the mezzanine and subordinated loans sector after suffering more than $4.5 billion in losses on its real estate and private equity portfolio in the first half of the

….. as 14-member international advisory board named

The CIC has named a 14-member International Advisory Council, which will advise the board and senior management on issues including portfolio development, strategy, and overseas investments. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CIC to invest cash, as global portfolio returns – 2.1 % for the year…

CIC is poised to invest more than 80 per cent of the assets still allocated to cash in its $100 billion global portfolio, as it outlined in its first annual report to stakeholders it”cannot achieve its goals without productively deploying its capital”. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

UK funds lead charge on ESG

The £3.6 billion ($5.9 billion) London Pensions Fund Authority has recently beefed up its internal environmental, social and governance capabilities, resulting in more effective engagement, including with the Mayor of London. Kristen Paech talks to chief executive Mike Taylor about LPFA’s short, medium and long-term objectives for ESG and why the fund has taken matters

Reorienting retirement risk management

The Pension Research Council, part of the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, recently hosted the 2009 Wharton Impact Conference, where leading academics, public pension sponsors and their advisors met to examine ways to reformulate and restructure retirement risk management. This is a summary of the proceedings, organised by Olivia Mitchell and Robert Clark.

Previous