CalPERS to hold public board meetings

CalPERS’ remaining board meetings for the year, in May, July and September, will be open to the public as the fund deliberates a full asset-liability assessment, culminating in a potential change to the benchmark rate of return in December.

The benchmark rate of return has been 7.75 per cent since June 2003, and Joe Dear, CalPERS chief investment officer, said “it makes sense to question fundamental assumptions about rates of return and make sure we’re comfortable with the target we have”.

All of the staff material and all of the board’s deliberation will be done in public.

“They’ll be an opportunity for anybody to address the board at the May, July, September board meetings and express a view about conservatism, optimism, what they think the right amount of risk there should be in the portfolio. So it’s all out in the open for everybody to see as we do this work,” Dear said.

Dear said at the May meeting the board would discuss capital market discussions and adjustments might need to be made.

Sponsored Content

This would follow with a board offsite in July the portfolio and building blocks will be weaved together to examine the expected rate of returns.

Dear and his team will then build various model portfolios between September and the board’s workshop in November which will result in a recommendation to bring back to the board in December.

Alan Milligan, CalPERS interim chief actuary, said if the board elects to change the assumed rate of return it will likely result in increasing employer contribution rates.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Is the financial services sector serving the public interest?

Fiduciary law, which creates the boundaries and rules for asset owners managing other people’s money, is evolving. The short-termism, misaligned incentives and complex and over-supply of services that characterises financial services, is under fire. Regulators around the world are increasingly looking at how to change the behaviour and supply chain dynamics in the industry, and

The impact of the mega manager

The impact of size is a delicate point for asset managers. For specialist asset classes, and boutique managers, being small and nimble can be a source of alpha. On the other hand, being large can reduce fees and increase innovation and product offering. But now there is evidence to show that the emergence of the

The contested role of asset consultants

Asset consultants are a key part of the investment chain, providing small funds with services that include decision making processes and strategic asset allocation, and for larger funds traditionally playing a key role in manager and strategy selection. But a study by Gordon Clark and Ashby Monk, which is part of a broader look by

Demystifying private equity

US public pension funds, on average, have around 9.4 per cent allocated to private equity but for many public funds monitoring the firms that manage these investments – including the transparency of underlying investments, fees, performance and benchmarking – as well justifying these investments to boards and stakeholders, takes up more than 10 per cent

Why investors employ smart beta strategies

The common view is smart beta is used to side step expensive active equity managers or hedge fund managers whose processes are on the surface opaque, but on close investigation turn out to be largely beta like in approach. As investors have gained experience and familiarity they have also learnt about how it offers greater

Managing culture with risk management techniques

The interaction between governance, culture and performance is increasingly a topic around asset owner board tables. But little has been written about the relationship between culture and the financial crisis, and how to change culture in financial services organisations. Andrew Lo, professor of finance at MIT, has come up with a proposal to change culture

Previous