CalPERS’ securities lending loss

CalPERS will continue its securities lending program following an annual review, despite significant pressure on its collateral pool, with income of $220 million generated for the year to March but unrealised losses on the internal collateral reinvestment of $854 million.

In a report to the board, the fund’s consultant, Wilshire said the significant unrealised loss in the collateral pool is likely to result in a total eventual loss to the fund of between $500 million and $1 billion.

This is due to the drop in prices on a lot of instruments purchased by CalPERS, with some securities defaulting or expected to default.

In an effort to limit any additional losses, the investment team has restricted all new investments to overnight securities, as they work out the damage to the collateral pool.

The internal staff annual review of the securities lending program confirmed the use of the program, a decision endorsed by Wilshire’s assessment.

In the past 12 months the fund held four auctions awarding more than $113 billion in assets to 11 borrowers, and in the past eight years CalPERS has auctioned off access to $835 billion in assets through 33 separate auctions, with cumulative net earnings of $1.4 billion.

Sponsored Content

Despite the failure, and merger, of several large counterparties over the past year, CalPERS has suffered no losses from defaults in any of its securities on loan.

According to Wilshire, CalPERS, like other lenders, requires over-collateralisation for all loans, and has simply kept the collateral, for no gain or loss, when a counterparty defaulted or declared bankruptcy. CalPERS had lent money to Lehman Brothers but incurred no losses on its default.

For the year to the end of March 2009, the average market value of securities on loan for the year was $33.5 billion, with annualised earnings of 23 bps. The large unrealised loss amount was due to CalPERS use of mark-to-market accounting on the valuation of the internal cash pool, which is not market convention on collateral reinvestment pools. The external portfolios use amortised cost pricing.

“This success reinforces the value of the auction platform and the demand in the marketplace to borrow CalPERS’ - the internal staff report said.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Why integrated reporting makes sense: Robert Eccles

Robert Eccles has been trying to change the nature of corporate reporting for more than 20 years. He has been an advocate for supplementing financials with information on non-financial factors that are leading indicators of financial results – such as product development, customer satisfaction and the development of intangible assets. The premise is those companies

Opportunities in Europe

Investors and academics agree that political developments in Greece are important because they may shape how financial markets will respond to future political situations in the Eurozone. But according to Olivier Rousseau, the executive director of the FFR, the French pension reserve fund, there is more hype outside of the Eurozone on the implications of

More evidence big is better in pension funds

A pension fund that has 10 times more assets under management has on average 7.67 basis points lower annual investment costs according to a working paper from authors at De Nederlansche Bank, that explores the relationship between pension fund size and investment costs. Written by Dirk Broeders, Arco van Oord and David Rijsbergen the paper

European investment plan requires public private collaboration

The two largest institutional investors in the Netherlands, PGGM and APG, have responded to the European Commission’s investment plan, urging the commission to call on institutional investors to collaborate on the investment proposal. However they also warn that institutional investors are not just a “subsidising entity” and the Juncker Plan is best executed as a

Why Andrew Ang joined Blackrock

Andrew Ang believes factor investing is a more efficient way to organise a portfolio as it allows liquid and illiquid strategies to be managed across the portfolio. It also has the added benefit of honing managers on value creation. He’s been working with a handful of investors while Professor of Finance at Columbia University on

The power of engagement

It is called the “CalPERS’ Effect” but it could easily be called the asset owner effect, or the institutional investor effect, or the power of engagement effect. Wilshire, which is a consultant to the $300 billion Californian fund CalPERS, has provided an update on its study measuring the effect of engagement on a targeted list of companies called the Focus List.

Previous