CalPERS punishes BlackRock for Stuy Town disaster

Another page has turned in the history of the Stuyvesant Town – Peter Cooper Village apartment buildings in New York, as iconic as they have been controversial since their initial construction in the 1940s. CalPERS, America’s largest pension fund, has terminated BlackRock, one of its property managers which led a 2006 purchase of the 80-acre site, after a 12-year relationship.

CalPERS wrote off US$500 million of its apartment portfolio after real estate manager Tishman Speyer Properties, which together with BlackRock and investors paid $5.4 billion for what the residents call “Stuy Town”, had given up control of the properties to avoid bankruptcy in January this year.

This week CalPERS terminated a $1 billion apartment management mandate with BlackRock, which had dated back to 1998. The fund has consolidated this with another long-time manager, the privately owned GID Investment Advisers.

The Stuy Town development marked the first major clearing of slum dwellings in New York, starting in 1943, financed largely by the insurer MetLife, which was awarded tax breaks and other government assistance.

It has been the subject of many court actions over the years, some on the basis of race. Courts ruled that the managers did not have to adhere to race discrimination laws applicable for public landlords, despite the government assistance in the development, and almost all the early tenants in the rent-controlled apartments were white.

CalPERS reported a loss of 37 per cent in its total real estate portfolio in the year to June. The fund is anticipating reduced costs and improved efficiency from consolidating its mandates under one partner/manager.

Sponsored Content

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

The cost of bad asset allocation

A study of 300 US pension funds by CEM Benchmarking reinforces the importance of asset allocation, highlighting the performance of asset classes, as well as new evidence on correlations between asset classes. Alex Beath, author of the study, discusses the implications for asset allocation with Amanda White. A CEM Benchmarking study “Asset Allocation and Fund

The OECD’s plan for long-term investment

G20 financial ministers and central bank governors welcomed the findings of the G20/OECD roundtable on institutional investors and long-term investment last month, which included clear plans to incentivise institutional investors to undertake more long-term investments. The roundtable, “From solutions to actions: implementing measures to encourage institutional long-term investment financing”, held in Singapore recognised that long-term

Why long-horizon investors should adopt factor-based asset allocation

Long-horizon investors can withstand macro-economic volatility and so should tilt towards strategies that are exposed to that, including value, small cap and momentum. Oleg Ruban, vice president in the applied research team at MSCI says this validates factor-investing and factor-based asset allocation for these investors.   Appropriate asset allocation requires explicit attention be paid to

The case for long-termism

Keith Ambachtsheer’s lead article in the Fall 2014 edition of the Rotman International Journal of Pension Management, takes readers through an historical and logical journey that supports the case for long-termism. Importantly he validates this with four high-profile investor case studies which demonstrate that a long-term view benefits society but also the investors, willing to

Investors alter allocations because of climate risks

A number of large institutional investors, including AP1, the Environment Agency and AustralianSuper, made changes to their strategic asset allocation as a result of Mercer’s 2011 study on climate risks, and now the consultant is working with a new raft of investors to assess forward-looking climate change scenarios against their current allocations. Meanwhile one of

Real estate sector continues to lead on sustainability: GRESB

This year’s Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark (GRESB) reveals that sustainability reporting has improved in coverage and quality of data, with the average overall score increasing due to increasing implementation and measurement. The average score is now 47 (out of 100) which is up nine points this year. The benchmark collects data from 637 listed

Previous