CalPERS formally adopts placement agency policy…

CalPERS has officially adopted a placement agent policy, in light of recent pay-to-play allegations at other public funds, and introduced an investment policy for leverage, as its total fund value increased to $177.5 billion as at April 23, up from $169.4 billion at the end of March.

The fund’s new placement agent policy requires external managers to disclose fees and other information about the placement agents they hire to seek CalPERS’ business.

One of the specifics of the policy is that placement agents must register as broker-dealers with the US Securities and Exchange Commission or the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, or CalPERS would decline the opportunity to retain or invest with the external manager or investment vehicle.

Other requirements set out by the policy are: CalPERS investment partners and external managers must disclose their retention or placement agents, the fees they pay them, the services performed, and other information about their engagement; disclosed information must include agents’ identities, resumes of key people, description of compensation and services, copies of agreements, and if the agent is registered.

CalPERS board president, Rob Feckner, said the policy would help ensure that decisions were made solely on the merits of proposed investments with full transparency and disclosure.

“We want to know who’s being hired, how much they’re being paid, what they’re paid for, and who pays them,” he said.

Sponsored Content

Interestingly, Aldus Equity, one of the firms caught in the New York State Fund’s placement agent brouhaha, was shortlisted alongside Brock Capital, Ennis Knupp & Associates, and Pension Consulting Alliance as a private equity consultant for CalPERS. The latter two were subsequently shortlisted and asked to present to the investment committee on May 11.

Meanwhile the purpose of the fund’s leverage policy is to set a framework for identifying, measuring, managing and reporting various forms of leverage, including limits on some forms of leverage.

As part of the policy, use of leverage is prohibited unless expressly permitted in the relevant asset class or program policy; and except for unsettled loss positions on non-exchange traded contracts, direct debt, is prohibited unless authorised by the investment committee for a defined purpose.

Private real estate, infrastructure and forestland include limits on the use of non-recourse debt, and recourse debt is prohibited for investments in risk managed absolute return strategies or other programs that do not have complete transparency on all investment positions.

The asset allocation/risk management unit will be required to report to the investment committee on leverage.

The fund saw its total assets increase to $177.5 billion at the end of April 23, partly due to the expanded asset allocation ranges approved in the December 2008 investment committee meeting.

As at April 23, the global equity allocation was 13 per cent under the 56 per cent target but within the range; and there was a cash allocation of 5.3 per cent, compared to a 0 per cent policy target.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous