CalPERS flooded with consultant RFPs after changes to wish-list

CalPERS has received 17 applications in response to its RFP for a general pension consultant services spring-fed pool – four times the applications of its last review – and will select consultants during its April 20 investment
committee meeting.

Since the last review in 2004, CalPERs made a series of changes to the consultant requirements, including the development of six service areas to increase the potential of receiving proposals from a higher number of firms in various investment specialties, revising the minimum qualifications of operating history and the experience of key personnel in providing consultant services to institutional funds clients.

There has been $1.2 million budgeted to spend on the consultants annually, but until the composition of the pool has been determined, the costs are not final.

Staff will present the ranked list of successful proposers for the committee review at the March 16 meeting, and a decision will be made the following month.

The $174.2 billion fund held an investment committee meeting last Tuesday with agenda items including an asset allocation review in the first half of 2009.

Sponsored Content

CalPERS set its new asset allocation on December 15, 2008, with policy targets to be implemented over a period of three to four years.

It changed its global equities allocation from 60 to 56 per cent and increased the private equity allocation from 6 to 10 per cent.

Global fixed income was also decreased, from 26 to 19 per cent, and inflation linked assets increased from an old policy target of 0 to 5 per cent.

Real estate targets increased from 8 to 10 per cent, while cash remained at the zero target allocation.

Among other things the committee was due to discuss were recommendations by consultant Wilshire to add two growth managers, rumoured to include Martin Currie and OFI Institutional Asset Management, one global core manager as well as two emerging markets managers. Any changes are yet to be confirmed.

It is expected that CalPERS will increase the amount of money managed internally, as its own managers have done well compared with external managers.

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

How to avoid being the butt of a carbon price joke

Executive director of the Asset Owners Disclosure Project and business director of the Climate Institute, Julian Poulter, aruges the progress of carbon legislation in Australia is a wake-up call to asset owners around the globe. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

What price is right for a low carbon future

Australia’s lower house of Parliament passed a carbon tax yesterday. It prices carbon at $23 a ton. India’s carbon tax is 80 rupees (about $1) a ton. So what is the appropriate price of carbon? According to Robert Litterman in his Financial Analysts Journal editorial, it is a complex equation that should reflect fundamental uncertainty

Déjà vu as Wilshire warns CalPERS of ARS portfolio risks

CalPERS’ absolute return strategies program is over-reliant on quantitative tools, inadequately staffed and may be overweight in certain strategies and risks, according to Wilshire’s annual review of the portfolio.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Investors have more than just voting in their engagement armoury, study finds

Institutional investors are using just a fraction of the “weapons” they have at their disposal when they engage with companies, and need to use the entire proxy proposal process better, Rob Bauer told attendees at a recent PRI conference.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

DiNapoli defends DB schemes

New York State Comptroller, Thomas DiNapoli, has defended public defined benefit schemes, saying that they are not a drag on state government finances, are sustainable and form a vital part of the US economy.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Funds seek the elixir of scale

The investment firepower and cost savings promised by economies of scale have enraptured the Australian superannuation industry. This has instilled in some funds an urge to merge in order to enjoy the benefits of being large. However some investment chiefs believe that bigger size brings a new set of problems that can undermine performance.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored

Previous