CalPERS flooded with consultant RFPs after changes to wish-list

CalPERS has received 17 applications in response to its RFP for a general pension consultant services spring-fed pool – four times the applications of its last review – and will select consultants during its April 20 investment
committee meeting.

Since the last review in 2004, CalPERs made a series of changes to the consultant requirements, including the development of six service areas to increase the potential of receiving proposals from a higher number of firms in various investment specialties, revising the minimum qualifications of operating history and the experience of key personnel in providing consultant services to institutional funds clients.

There has been $1.2 million budgeted to spend on the consultants annually, but until the composition of the pool has been determined, the costs are not final.

Staff will present the ranked list of successful proposers for the committee review at the March 16 meeting, and a decision will be made the following month.

The $174.2 billion fund held an investment committee meeting last Tuesday with agenda items including an asset allocation review in the first half of 2009.

Sponsored Content

CalPERS set its new asset allocation on December 15, 2008, with policy targets to be implemented over a period of three to four years.

It changed its global equities allocation from 60 to 56 per cent and increased the private equity allocation from 6 to 10 per cent.

Global fixed income was also decreased, from 26 to 19 per cent, and inflation linked assets increased from an old policy target of 0 to 5 per cent.

Real estate targets increased from 8 to 10 per cent, while cash remained at the zero target allocation.

Among other things the committee was due to discuss were recommendations by consultant Wilshire to add two growth managers, rumoured to include Martin Currie and OFI Institutional Asset Management, one global core manager as well as two emerging markets managers. Any changes are yet to be confirmed.

It is expected that CalPERS will increase the amount of money managed internally, as its own managers have done well compared with external managers.

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Australian contributions increase shifts retirement burden

The increase in the Australian superannuation guarantee (SG) from 9 to 12 per cent of salary is an example of how the retirement savings burden, a global phenomenon, can be shifted from the public to private sectors, according to senior partner at Mercer, David Knox. The increase in the SG, which has been approved in

Why you should take notice of what we write

New research released this month gives impetus to the evidence that newspaper articles can predict aggregate future stock returns. Conducted by Professor of Finance at the University of St Gallen in Switzerland, Manuel Ammann, it examines articles in the German finance paper, Handeslblatt, from July 1989 until March 2011, and overall found that “newspaper content

CalPERS to move $1bn fixed income in-house

CalPERS plans to move $1 billion of its externally-managed international fixed income portfolio in-house in the next 12 months, but it will require board approval to do so.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Texas Teachers extends manager partnerships

Texas Teachers Retirement System has extended a unique public markets strategic partnership structure to two of its private market managers in a move it claims will give the fund a long-term strategic advantage over other investors.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Keynes and the character required for a long-term view

In the interests of educating myself I recently read Chapter 12 “The State of Long-Term Expectations” in John Maynard Keynes’ seminal economics tome General Theory. I particularly like his statement: “it needs more intelligence to defeat the forces of time and our ignorance of the future than to beat the gun”, but then I’ve always

Recipe for avoiding half-baked dynamic asset allocation

In what is lauded as somewhat of a Laurel and Hardy performance, APG’s Stefan Lundbergh and academic provocateur Jack Gray, demonstrate the disparity between ideology and action in a hypothetical dynamic asset allocation case study. But jokes aside, it highlights the misnomer in the words “best practice”, and the lack of courage in this industry.

Previous