CalPERS’ first review of ILAC results in benchmark appraisal

CalPERS has conducted its first-ever annual review of the inflation-linked asset class (ILAC) program and has made a number of changes including moving the responsibility of the asset class to real estate. Amanda White looks at the fund’s plans for ILAC in the coming year.


Inflation-linked asset class has only been a separate asset class at CalPERS since January 2008 and while it has a strategic asset allocation of 5 per cent, the total fund allocation currently sits at around 2.4 per cent.

This review, the first for the fund, has produced a number of structural and implementation changes to the management of the asset class.

One of the consequences of the review is to hand responsibilities of the asset class to the senior investment officer of real estate (SIO-RE), away from the asset allocation team.

Sponsored Content

This year the fund will commit up to $900 million to funds and $400 million to direct infrastructure on a selective basis and will also build a direct investment capability within infrastructure.

It will also review the benchmark of the ILAC program – which is currently CPI plus 400 basis points – based on the asset mix and results.

Wilshire Associates, the fund’s consultant, is encouraging a rethinking of the benchmark.

“While CPI+$ is an appropriate long term target for inflation-linked assets in general, the substantial investment in commodities is causing quite a bit of tracking error in the total program.

“Depending on the preference of the SIO-RE after he integrates ILAC into his team, the benchmark could be changed to a roll-up of each program’s benchmark or he could decrease the weighting to commodities.

“Although the prior CIO believed strongly in managing the entire asset class against CPI+4, we believe the more pragmatic approach is to change the benchmark to better reflect the considerable volatility of commodities.”

Wilshire Associates says the SIO-RE should present to the investment committee his plan for how to manage this portfolio and how he intends to allocate assets among the various programs as soon as practical.

“We believe it is paramount that the SIO-RE has a clear methodology in place for managing these new assets,” the consultant said in a letter to the investment committee.

ILAC includes infrastructure, commodities, forestland and inflation-linked bonds, and the fund is well below its allocation to infrastructure with a current commitment of 0.11 per cent, against a benchmark of 1.5 per cent of the total fund.

Similarly commodities is 0.41 per cent, compared to 1.5 per cent, while inflation-linked bonds sits at 0.74 per cent (target weight of 1 per cent), and forestland at 1.12 per cent (compared to 1 per cent).

The total ILAC allocation of 2.4 per cent represents about $4.84 billion.

Meketa Investment Group, the fund’s infrastructure consultant, said that CalPERS had some internal resource constraints, which are being addressed, that contributed to the slow pace of commitments in 2009. The fund made one new partnership commitment only during the year, bringing the total number of partnerships to four, and $88.5 million only was committed across those partnerships throughout the year.

In a letter to the investment committee, the consultant goes on to say the most meaningful development to the infrastructure program in 2009 was the development of its internal investment capabilities.

Last year it hired two portfolio managers, and now has five in the team, and began developing internal processes and external sourcing capabilities focused on executing direct infrastructure investments.

This is a step in the right direction to support CalPERS’ objective of pursuing direct investment opportunities.
CalPERS only made its first infrastructure commitment as part of this program, only two years ago.

The ILAC asset class has performed well with a return for the year to December of 5.97 per cent, compared with the benchmark (CPI plus 400 bps) of 4.99 per cent.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous