CalPERS commits to defined benefit

A set of 12 federal legislative policy priorities adopted by the board of CalPERS underpins the fund’s commitment to preserving defined benefit plans, and positions the fund firmly in the defined benefit camp in the debate over pension design.

Vice-president of CalPERS board, Dr George Diehr (pictured), said dismantling defined benefit plans or imposing unreasonable mandates would only further erode confidence in America’s retirement system.

The fund has adopted a set of priorities which will serve as a “road map” for advancing CalPERS’ federal governmental goals on retirement, outline its positions on retirement benefits, funding and accountability of pension plans and social security.

CalPERS’ priorities call for the pension plan to support:

  • defined benefit retirement plans that provide sound income replacement in retirement through shared employee and employer responsibility
  • expanded opportunities for workers to have access to a defined benefit pension plan
  • tax policies that encourage preservation of pension plans and retirement savings accounts by allowing deferral of taxation contributions and earnings until benefits are paid in retirement
  • policies that ensure the highest level of integrity and accountability in the administration of supplemental retirement accounts and elements such as fee disclosure
  • policies that report public pension liabilities that reflect the long-term nature of public employee retirement plans
  • accounting standards that preserve the link between accounting and funding such as portfolio diversification, smoothing of investment gains and losses and managing growth of liabilities to minimise contributions volatility, including support of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board
  • policies extending the long-term solvency of the Social Security system without reducing benefits for CalPERS members and other Americans

Further, the priorities also call for the fund to oppose:

  • mandates on pension plan design features or policies that would undermine defined benefit plans
  • legislation that would establish mandates requiring specific funding, accounting or actuarial standards for state and local pension plans

The CalPERS priorities can be downloaded here

Sponsored Content

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

CFA to lead industry out of crisis

Protecting the pension system is one of six key themes at the centre of the CFA Institute’s Future of Finance initiative as it aims to empower the investment industry to take leadership in restoring trust. Speaking at the sixty-sixth annual CFA Institute conference in Singapore this week, president and chief executive of the CFA Institute,

Tail risk parity, V 1.0

Just when you thought you were safe, the next reiteration of risk parity has arrived. AllianceBernstein’s tail risk parity takes the concept of risk parity, reallocating assets uniformly according to risk, but it uses tail risk, not volatility, as the core measure. The concept of risk parity is a portfolio diversified according to risk, rather

Retirement: a cause worth working on

There are two things that drive the newly appointed global chief operating officer of State Street Global Advisors, Greg Ehret, in his bid to improve the client experience: the retirement business is a cause worth working on and the clients are the reason the business exists. Ehret was appointed to the new position at SSgA,

Pension funds, where banks no longer go?

There continues to be potential for pension capital appearing where bank lending no longer wants to go. Commentators in the UK and continental Europe have heightened expectations that pension funds will step in to help fill the continent’s bank financing gap. Societe Generale, for instance, recently predicted further “disintermediation” by investors sidestepping banks and looking

Building consensus for investment beliefs at CalPERS

An investment-beliefs workshop for the CalPERS board, held in April, revealed five areas, including active management, where the views of the board and staff lacked consensus. The contentious, or unsettled, topics for discussion were active management, private asset classes, sustainability (environmental, social and governance), investment performance targets and stakeholder considerations. At the board workshop, Janine

Behind PGGM’s ESG index

In 2010 PGGM conducted a study to see if it was possible to reduce the number of companies it invested in from 4000 to 400, based on its environmental, social and governance leanings, and still maintain it’s beta risk/return profile. The idea was that the €133-billion ($174-billion) fund would better know and understand what it

Previous