CalPERS’ effect persists: Wilshire analyses focus list performance

CalPERS will review all elements to the methodology of its successful focus list in the coming months, as the latest study by Wilshire shows companies on CalPERS’ radar over the past 23 years have had a total return turnaround of 32.5 per cent on average.In Wilshire’s annual review it looked at the companies’ performance for the five-year returns before and after CalPER’s attention, and found they retuned 12.7 per cent above their benchmark for the five years after their “initiative date”, or 2.4 per cent on an annualised basis, compared with 83.3 per cent below benchmark for the five years before CalPERS focus, or -30.1 per cent annualised.

Since inception of the focus list 23 years ago, the fund has targeted 142 companies, with the number of companies on the list in any one year ranging from four to 11.

The review of methodology and consideration of new engagement opportunities for shareowner intervention, is triggered by a belief that now is an opportune time to complete a comprehensive review due to recent market developments and regulatory reform.

As part of the review input will be sought from academics, external managers, governance data providers and staff.

According to a paper to be presented to the investment committee next week, the annual Wilshire study on CalPERS corporate governance program has shown the “CalPERS effect” on targeted company share prices persists and that the fund’s “involvement has generally stopped the rapid erosion of performance results”.

Wilshire conducts an annual analysis of CalPERS corporate governance effectiveness by measuring the stock returns of companies placed on the focus list.

Sponsored Content

At the moment the focus list process involves an initial screen which includes 40 per cent stock performance, 30 per cent return on invested capital, and 30 per cent corporate governance criteria; from the lowest-ranked 50 companies, 15 preliminary focus list companies are selected; these are approved by the investment committee; then staff meets with the focus list company representatives and requests specified governance reform; staff then develops focus list and monitoring list company recommendations based upon each company’s response to CalPERS requested governance reform; the investment committee gives the final recommendation; CalPERS publicises the focus list companies; and monitoring continues for up to three years representing extended engagement of prior focus list and monitoring list companies.

The companies on the focus list for 2009 were Eli Lilly, Hill-Rom Holdings, Hospitality Properties Trust, and IMS Health;

For 2008 they were: Cheescake Factory Inc, Hilb Rogal and Hobbs Company, Invacare Corporation, La-Z-Boy, Standard Pacific Corporation.

For 2007 they were: Corinthian Colleges Inc, Dollar Tree Stores, Eli Lilly & Co, EMC Corp, International paper Corp, Kellwood Corp, Marsh & McLennan Co, Sanmina0SCI Corp, Sara Lee Corp, Tenet Healthcare Corp, Tribune Co.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Invest in line with how old you feel

How old do you feel? Academics at Maastricht argue that not only our true age but also our subjective age should be integrated into designing and marketing financial products and services like target date funds and pension products.

Tough 2020 for Canadian funds: Aon

Now that we’re in the midst of 2020, it might be easy for investors to forget how big a turnaround 2019 actually was for financial markets. One way to look at it is through the Aon Median Solvency Ratio, a quarterly survey that gauges the financial health of an important slice of the institutional investor community, Canadian defined benefit pension plans. Erwan Pirou, Canada CIO for Aon asks whether markets – and, by extension, pension plan solvency – can stage a repeat performance in 2020.

Reaction to Coronavirus: Cambridge Assoc

The Wuhan coronavirus is still spreading, but according to Aaron Costello who is regional head, Asia, at Cambridge Associates, investors should stay calm. The virus remains less deadly and more contained than the SARS outbreak of 2002–03. Looking at other epidemics, history suggests that after an initial sharp hit, economies and markets typically recover quickly.

Live Stream 2020 | DAY 2

[vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_empty_space] Zoom room one Professor Stephen Kotkin, Professor in History and International Affairs, Princeton University (United States) Karen Karniol-Tambour, head of investment research, Bridgewater Associates (United States) Current number of participants: 1 [vc_btn title=”Join” color=”pink” align=”left” custom_onclick=”true” el_id=”zoom1″ custom_onclick_code=”window.open(“https://live.wallf.ly/vstats/zoom.php“+location.search+“&zoom=zoom2“);”]mrec4 Zoom room two Kate Barker, chair, BCSSS (United Kingdom) Michael Hewett, managing director, investor relations, SVP

The Curious Quant

The Curious Quant series, hosted by Michael Kollo, is a discussion between technically-minded professionals in the financial services, technology and data science fields. It carefully examines the application of new data and new methodologies to common problems in financial markets. The aim is to promote better discussions about these emerging areas, and a better understanding of new technologies.

Time’s up for climate lobbyists

While hopeful this week’s UN Climate Action Summit generates a huge leap forward, Fiona Reynolds calls on investors to redouble efforts to address negative corporate climate lobbying. She writes from New York.

Previous