Calls for global governance code go unheard

The global application of a code of best practice for institutional investors, developed by the UK Financial Reporting Council, was debated at the International Corporate Governance Network’s annual conference in Toronto. Amanda White reports.


anne_sheehan_nlThe International Corporate Governance Network (ICGN) has been looking at a code of best practice for institutional investors for years. Now a collaboration of four associations in the UK have collectively written a governance code for local constituents.

Peter Montagnon, senior investment adviser at the Financial Reporting Council, which is the UK’s independent regulator responsible for promoting confidence in corporate reporting and governance, says a final version of the code will be released at the end of this month.

While it has been difficult to get consensus, the associations, including the Association of British Insurers, NAPF and the Investment Management Association, have finally agreed on seven principles that will underpin the new Stewardship Code. The next, and perhaps more critical stage, is the must-have buy-in from investors.

One of the motivations for the code is to improve the quality and effectiveness of the dialogue between shareholders and the companies they invest in.

“We want to improve the quality of communication, not just at annual meetings,” Montagnon says.

Sponsored Content

One of the delicate balances is the relationship between the regulators and shareholders, and Montagnon says shareholders need to be aware of the differences in their motivations.

“The balance between regulators and shareholder enthusiasm is a challenge,” he says. “Shareholders want to increase value, and regulators want to minimise risk and want shareholders to help monitor that. Shareholders have to push back on that.”

The code also aims to set out the chain of participants and ask funds managers to report whether they apply the code.

“If they don’t that’s fine, but if they do we want them to see how they do.”

Montagnon believes the process of engagement needs to be more international and wants to persuade international institutions which hold UK securities to follow the code.

“This needs to be internationalised so it’s not too onerous,” he says.

But Anne Sheehan, director of corporate governance at CalSTRS believes the idea of a code in the US is a “big leap”.

“We are trying to get our colleagues in the US to make sure they recognise we need to be good stewards, but we are behind the game. I can’t imagine the regulators devising and enforcing it,” she says.

While Sheehan believes a regulatory approach is not the solution in the US, she does believe there is room for larger funds to lead by example.

“CalSTRS started in 1913 and from the beginning we had a culture of looking out for interests of teachers [the fund’s member base]. But were we always good, diligent stewards? Leading up to the crisis, maybe not. We were riding the wave up but not thinking enough about the risks of the way down. We were part of the problem,” she says. “Our board is asking what more could we do to take leadership role, to lead by example.”

Sheehan recommends more transparency as a first step for her US counterparts.

“We are being transparent about our actions, for example we pre-announce our votes. More needs to be done. We want to lead by example with other larger funds and say what we expect from fellow funds. Because we are global investors need to know what’s happening in other parts of the world, but we’re just beginning to walk.”

CalSTRS is going through the process of getting funds managers to integrate sustainability into their investment processes.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

The cost of bad asset allocation

A study of 300 US pension funds by CEM Benchmarking reinforces the importance of asset allocation, highlighting the performance of asset classes, as well as new evidence on correlations between asset classes. Alex Beath, author of the study, discusses the implications for asset allocation with Amanda White. A CEM Benchmarking study “Asset Allocation and Fund

The OECD’s plan for long-term investment

G20 financial ministers and central bank governors welcomed the findings of the G20/OECD roundtable on institutional investors and long-term investment last month, which included clear plans to incentivise institutional investors to undertake more long-term investments. The roundtable, “From solutions to actions: implementing measures to encourage institutional long-term investment financing”, held in Singapore recognised that long-term

Why long-horizon investors should adopt factor-based asset allocation

Long-horizon investors can withstand macro-economic volatility and so should tilt towards strategies that are exposed to that, including value, small cap and momentum. Oleg Ruban, vice president in the applied research team at MSCI says this validates factor-investing and factor-based asset allocation for these investors.   Appropriate asset allocation requires explicit attention be paid to

The case for long-termism

Keith Ambachtsheer’s lead article in the Fall 2014 edition of the Rotman International Journal of Pension Management, takes readers through an historical and logical journey that supports the case for long-termism. Importantly he validates this with four high-profile investor case studies which demonstrate that a long-term view benefits society but also the investors, willing to

Investors alter allocations because of climate risks

A number of large institutional investors, including AP1, the Environment Agency and AustralianSuper, made changes to their strategic asset allocation as a result of Mercer’s 2011 study on climate risks, and now the consultant is working with a new raft of investors to assess forward-looking climate change scenarios against their current allocations. Meanwhile one of

Real estate sector continues to lead on sustainability: GRESB

This year’s Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark (GRESB) reveals that sustainability reporting has improved in coverage and quality of data, with the average overall score increasing due to increasing implementation and measurement. The average score is now 47 (out of 100) which is up nine points this year. The benchmark collects data from 637 listed

Previous