Bolivia to nationalise pensions

The Bolivian Government will nationalise the privately run pension system, with new pension reform law due to be implemented half way through this year. It follows reform from its southern neighbour, Argentina, which nationalised its $24 billion pension fund industry two years ago.On December 10, President Evo Morales signed a new pension reform law, which was approved by the Bolivian Parliament on December 3, that lowers the retirement age, nationalises the privately run pension system and extends pension protection to the informal workers’ sector.

Retirement age will be lowered from 65 to 58 for both men and women. Miners will be eligible to retire at age 56, and mothers with at least three children at age 55.

A Towers Watson report on the reform says the reduction runs contrary to the global trend to raise retirement ages, but the government says that Bolivia is a special case, as many Bolivians work in harsh manual jobs, and life expectancy is only 62 years for men and 65 for women.

The management of the current pension system of individual accounts, which was created in 1997 to replace the state pay-as-you-go system, (for more information see this World Bank paper) will be nationalised. A new state entity, Gestora Publica de la Seguridad Social de Largo Plazo, will administer the pension funds, which are currently run by two transcontinental banks – Switzerland’s Zurich Financial Services AG, and Prevision SA, managed by Spain’s Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA.

Workers will continue to pay 12.2 per cent of their earnings into the individual accounts.

A Solidarity Fund will also be set up to guarantee minimum levels of pension to all workers, based on years of contributions. The fund is intended to provide pensions, for the first time, to the 60 per cent of Bolivians who work in the informal sector and who make voluntary contributions of their own for at least 10 years. The fund will also be used to make up shortfalls in benefits provided to salaried workers under the individual account system.

Sponsored Content

The Solidarity Fund will be financed by payroll taxes of 3 per cent for employers and 0.5 per cent for employees, with an additional percentage (not yet specified) for higher-income employees.

According to Towers Watson, Bolivia’s Federation of Private Employers lobbied against the reforms, claiming the new system was financially unsustainable, while the Bolivia workers’ federation (COB) fully supported the reforms. The nationalisation of the pension system follows a series of nationalisations of utility companies since President Morales came to power in 2006.

Changes in the official retirement ages under social security will affect workforce planning for employers, as most workers are expected to retire when they reach those ages. The Solidarity Fund payroll taxes will increase the social tax burden for employers, the report says.

Asset Owner:World Bank

One response to “Bolivia to nationalise pensions”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Invest in line with how old you feel

How old do you feel? Academics at Maastricht argue that not only our true age but also our subjective age should be integrated into designing and marketing financial products and services like target date funds and pension products.

Tough 2020 for Canadian funds: Aon

Now that we’re in the midst of 2020, it might be easy for investors to forget how big a turnaround 2019 actually was for financial markets. One way to look at it is through the Aon Median Solvency Ratio, a quarterly survey that gauges the financial health of an important slice of the institutional investor community, Canadian defined benefit pension plans. Erwan Pirou, Canada CIO for Aon asks whether markets – and, by extension, pension plan solvency – can stage a repeat performance in 2020.

Reaction to Coronavirus: Cambridge Assoc

The Wuhan coronavirus is still spreading, but according to Aaron Costello who is regional head, Asia, at Cambridge Associates, investors should stay calm. The virus remains less deadly and more contained than the SARS outbreak of 2002–03. Looking at other epidemics, history suggests that after an initial sharp hit, economies and markets typically recover quickly.

Live Stream 2020 | DAY 2

[vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_empty_space] Zoom room one Professor Stephen Kotkin, Professor in History and International Affairs, Princeton University (United States) Karen Karniol-Tambour, head of investment research, Bridgewater Associates (United States) Current number of participants: 1 [vc_btn title=”Join” color=”pink” align=”left” custom_onclick=”true” el_id=”zoom1″ custom_onclick_code=”window.open(“https://live.wallf.ly/vstats/zoom.php“+location.search+“&zoom=zoom2“);”]mrec4 Zoom room two Kate Barker, chair, BCSSS (United Kingdom) Michael Hewett, managing director, investor relations, SVP

The Curious Quant

The Curious Quant series, hosted by Michael Kollo, is a discussion between technically-minded professionals in the financial services, technology and data science fields. It carefully examines the application of new data and new methodologies to common problems in financial markets. The aim is to promote better discussions about these emerging areas, and a better understanding of new technologies.

Time’s up for climate lobbyists

While hopeful this week’s UN Climate Action Summit generates a huge leap forward, Fiona Reynolds calls on investors to redouble efforts to address negative corporate climate lobbying. She writes from New York.

Previous