Blackrock looks favourably on equities

Blackrock has a favourable view on equities, relative to bonds, but within fixed income it advocates an unconstrained approach. Amanda White spoke to chief investment strategist, Russ Koesterich.

 

Equities look cheap relative to bonds or cash, says chief investment strategist for Blackrock and iShares chief global investment strategist, Russ Koesterich, with the manager recommending an overweight position in equities.

While equities are stressed they are cheaper than bonds or cash on a relative basis.

“At the highest level we would be overweight equities,” he says.

Within equities the manager is overweight Europe, cutting back on its US exposure.

Sponsored Content

“Europe is politically more stable and the risks are reflected in the price, which is a good deal cheaper than US.”

Koesterich, who is a founding member of the Blackrock Investment Institute which delivers Blackrock’s insights on global investment issues, says the discount in European equities relative to the US is sufficiently cheap, and when combined with the catalysts for growth in Europe, it look attractive.

He cites the possibility of an additional stimulus by the European Central Bank at the end of the year, and a more favourable monetary environment.

“The US market is fully valued. I don’t see it as particularly expensive but it’s not a bargain. Most of the gains in the US have been through multiple expansion, through stock market expansion, and it’s become expensive.”

Quantitative easing has supported this and also impacted the long-end of the treasury curve.

The impact of this is that investors are looking to source yield in alternative places.

Within fixed income, Koesterich says it is still hard to find any bargains, although there are pockets of opportunities including the US municipal market and hard currency and emerging market debt.

Blackrock is an advocate of unconstrained fixed income, which gives the manager greater flexibility to make larger latitudinal shifts in duration.

“Adjusting against duration is an advantage of a non-benchmark portfolio,” he says.

Given the continued volatility in fixed income Blackrock argues for an unconstrained fixed income portfolio, particularly given traditional benchmarks are typically concentrated in government-related debt.

And while the future is difficult to predict, the manager says there are three factors that will shape the direction of the bond market: interest rates should move higher over the year; rates at the “belly” of the yield curve will rise more dramatically than long-term rates; and volatility among and within fixed income sectors should be high.

As chief investment strategies of the world’s largest manager, Keosterich has a big job, which is made easier by the fact the firm has a lot of scope, and he can draw on experts from every asset class.

There are often cases when Blackrock’s views are the same as other managers, but the purpose is not to be different.

“We don’t set out to have a different view but to do what is best for clients,” he says.

In terms of portfolio construction, he advises investors should always keep in mind what “they are afraid of”.

“Putting portfolios together should be driven by the idiosyncrasies of what an investor is trying to achieve,” he says.

He believes there is often too much focus on returns with risk often omitted.

“Risk is important to think about, and if investors are basing risk on the past 18 months they may be underestimating risk.”

Investors must first decide what risk they are hedging or defending against – whether it be equity market slowdowns or interest rates – and change their investments accordingly.

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

The cost of bad asset allocation

A study of 300 US pension funds by CEM Benchmarking reinforces the importance of asset allocation, highlighting the performance of asset classes, as well as new evidence on correlations between asset classes. Alex Beath, author of the study, discusses the implications for asset allocation with Amanda White. A CEM Benchmarking study “Asset Allocation and Fund

The OECD’s plan for long-term investment

G20 financial ministers and central bank governors welcomed the findings of the G20/OECD roundtable on institutional investors and long-term investment last month, which included clear plans to incentivise institutional investors to undertake more long-term investments. The roundtable, “From solutions to actions: implementing measures to encourage institutional long-term investment financing”, held in Singapore recognised that long-term

Why long-horizon investors should adopt factor-based asset allocation

Long-horizon investors can withstand macro-economic volatility and so should tilt towards strategies that are exposed to that, including value, small cap and momentum. Oleg Ruban, vice president in the applied research team at MSCI says this validates factor-investing and factor-based asset allocation for these investors.   Appropriate asset allocation requires explicit attention be paid to

The case for long-termism

Keith Ambachtsheer’s lead article in the Fall 2014 edition of the Rotman International Journal of Pension Management, takes readers through an historical and logical journey that supports the case for long-termism. Importantly he validates this with four high-profile investor case studies which demonstrate that a long-term view benefits society but also the investors, willing to

Investors alter allocations because of climate risks

A number of large institutional investors, including AP1, the Environment Agency and AustralianSuper, made changes to their strategic asset allocation as a result of Mercer’s 2011 study on climate risks, and now the consultant is working with a new raft of investors to assess forward-looking climate change scenarios against their current allocations. Meanwhile one of

Real estate sector continues to lead on sustainability: GRESB

This year’s Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark (GRESB) reveals that sustainability reporting has improved in coverage and quality of data, with the average overall score increasing due to increasing implementation and measurement. The average score is now 47 (out of 100) which is up nine points this year. The benchmark collects data from 637 listed

Previous