Big Canadian, Australian funds go shopping

The Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (CPPIB) and Australia’s Future Fund have banded together to buy out the majority of investors in a direct property fund.The big institutions bought $673 million in property assets from 10 of the 12 existing investors in an unlisted property fund run by Colonial First State Global Asset Management (CFS GAM), turning the fund into a retail property-focused investment vehicle called the CFS GAM Property Retail Partnership.

The buy-out of existing investors, described in an announcement as a “recapitalisation and restructure”, will see CFS GAM remain as the manager of the fund.

The partnership currently manages $1 billion of investments in regional and sub-regional shopping centres in Australia, and provides the opportunity for other major institutional investors to join in a ‘clubbing’ arrangement.

Darren Steinberg, head of property at CFS GAM, said the diversified portfolio would have less than 20 per cent gearing, and that parent company Colonial First State, a large Australian financial services provider, would not invest in the partnership but would be paid management fees.

At March 31, the Future Fund invested 4 per cent of its $61 billion (excluding Telstra shares) in property. Among its publicised deals is its 50 per cent stake in the $426 million Lakeside Joondalup Shopping City in Perth, acquired through a joint-venture with Australian manager Lend Lease.

The $122 billion CPPIB has an active interest in Australian property, being an 80 per cent shareholder in the $359 million unlisted Goodman Australian Development Fund. Last year, it and the Ontario Teachers Pension Plan unsuccessfully attempted to take over toll road operator Transurban. Each has a 14 per cent stake in the business.

Sponsored Content

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Investors x embrace ethics

More than half of the world’s largest sovereign wealth funds, and around a third of the largest US state pension funds, have a disclosed code of ethics for their staff. According to the Public Fund Investment Policies 2015 annual review produced by the Ohio State University Moritz College of Law, a code of ethics helps

Shared fund objectives key to investor success

The practice of benchmarking the salaries of senior executives of institutional funds with reference to external financial services firms, instead of the shared objectives of the fund, is a major barrier to their success, according to Professor Gordon Clark of Oxford University and director of Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment. Clark sees the

PGGM halves CO2 footprint in investments

Ahead of the COP21 in Paris, the second largest Dutch fund with €161 billion ($160 billion), Pensioenfonds Zorg en Welzijn (PFZW), has announced it will halve the CO2 footprint of its investments by 2020. After an in-depth study with its fund manager, PGGM, the fund has decided its capital should be focused on companies that

Mercer’s seven tools for risk management reflect evolving landscape

Mercer Investments is using its deep insurance and environmental, social and governance (ESG) skills, contacts and processes to evolve its tools for advising clients on investment risk assessment, analysis and reporting – a move that reflects the evolving landscape for risk faced by investors. Partner and global head of responsible investment at Mercer, Jane Ambachtsheer,

OTPP advises on climate risk mitigation

Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan (OTPP), an investor known for its advanced risk-management tools and processes, considers that the common tools available to investors to mitigate carbon risk for investors – portfolio carbon footprints and thematic divestment – provide incomplete risk management. The fund has suggested macro- and microanalysis is necessary to understand a company’s complete

PRI to consider new principle focusing on systemic risks

The UN-backed Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) is considering a seventh principle that will focus on broad financial system systemic risks. The six principles were written before the global financial crisis and are focused on environmental, social and governance (ESG) integration. Now, a decade after their creation, consideration of systemic risks is on the agenda and

Previous