Arizona expands allocation ranges, freezes private investments

The $27 billion Arizona State Retirement System has extended its asset allocation ranges and postponed the approval of new commitments to private market investments until the end of June, unless an overriding investment opportunity exception exists.

The delay on new private market allocations is an extension of the fund’s decision in January to postpone until March allocations to investments with locked-up capital in private equity, private real estate, opportunistic investment. The fund has a target allocation of 6 per cent to real estate, and 5 per cent to private equity, with a zero allocation to opportunistic, but a range of up to 5 per cent.

At the fund’s investment meeting last week the committee decided to extend its asset allocation ranges on equities and fixed income from plus or minus 5 per cent, to 10 per cent, in the hope an extended range may reduce the need for rebalancing that is inconsistent with the ASRS relative value perspective.

The proposed new ranges are 35 to 55 per cent for US equity, 8 to 28 per cent for international equity, and 16-26 per cent for US fixed income. Prior to this approval the ranges were 26 to 36 per cent for US large cap equities, 5 to 9 per cent for US mid cap equities, and 5 to 9 per cent for US small cap equities. At the moment there is an 18 per cent allocation to international equities, and a 26 per cent allocation to US fixed income.

The fund’s investment management division, along with consultants New England Pension Consultants (NEPC) and Mercer, also recommended the opportunistic investment committee consider rescinding the approval of global tactical asset allocation mandates and reclassify the funds allocated to US equity, and non-US equity and fixed income.

Sponsored Content

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

The cost of bad asset allocation

A study of 300 US pension funds by CEM Benchmarking reinforces the importance of asset allocation, highlighting the performance of asset classes, as well as new evidence on correlations between asset classes. Alex Beath, author of the study, discusses the implications for asset allocation with Amanda White. A CEM Benchmarking study “Asset Allocation and Fund

The OECD’s plan for long-term investment

G20 financial ministers and central bank governors welcomed the findings of the G20/OECD roundtable on institutional investors and long-term investment last month, which included clear plans to incentivise institutional investors to undertake more long-term investments. The roundtable, “From solutions to actions: implementing measures to encourage institutional long-term investment financing”, held in Singapore recognised that long-term

Why long-horizon investors should adopt factor-based asset allocation

Long-horizon investors can withstand macro-economic volatility and so should tilt towards strategies that are exposed to that, including value, small cap and momentum. Oleg Ruban, vice president in the applied research team at MSCI says this validates factor-investing and factor-based asset allocation for these investors.   Appropriate asset allocation requires explicit attention be paid to

The case for long-termism

Keith Ambachtsheer’s lead article in the Fall 2014 edition of the Rotman International Journal of Pension Management, takes readers through an historical and logical journey that supports the case for long-termism. Importantly he validates this with four high-profile investor case studies which demonstrate that a long-term view benefits society but also the investors, willing to

Investors alter allocations because of climate risks

A number of large institutional investors, including AP1, the Environment Agency and AustralianSuper, made changes to their strategic asset allocation as a result of Mercer’s 2011 study on climate risks, and now the consultant is working with a new raft of investors to assess forward-looking climate change scenarios against their current allocations. Meanwhile one of

Real estate sector continues to lead on sustainability: GRESB

This year’s Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark (GRESB) reveals that sustainability reporting has improved in coverage and quality of data, with the average overall score increasing due to increasing implementation and measurement. The average score is now 47 (out of 100) which is up nine points this year. The benchmark collects data from 637 listed

Previous