Are hedge fund investors getting what they paid for?

Alternative hedge fund beta allows investors to access the returns generated by hedge funds without the pressures of finding alpha, says Fama family professor of finance at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business, Tobias Moskowitz.

Moskowitz says there are three components to hedge fund returns: unique alpha, traditional market beta, and “something else”, which he calls alternative hedge fund beta and describes as the common risk/reward exposures shared by hedge funds.

Over time, he says, the alpha component of what hedge fund managers are delivering has been shrinking.

“Betas are larger than market neutral or absolute return managers claim,” Moskowitz says. “Alpha as a concept has shrunk but the opportunity set is still the same.

“If you look at what’s inside hedge funds, there are some hedge funds with unique alpha, there is also a lot of traditional market beta, but there is also something in between. This alternative beta gives you access to alternatives without having to find the alpha.”

Hedge fund managers are paid to deliver alpha, but Moskowitz thinks the returns of hedge funds are highly correlated and he questions what investors are actually paying for.

Sponsored Content

“Alphas are smaller than average returns, you’re paying fees for index-fund components,” he says.

There has been a disconnect between what investors want from hedge funds and what they have been delivering.

By way of example, he says, over past few years the absolute return indexes have been closely correlated with the MSCI World Index.

The CS Tremont Hedge Fund index has a correlation with the MSCI of 0.83 over five years, and with the HFRI Hedge Fund Index of 0.91.

“Finding historical alpha is easy, he says, but finding future alpha is very difficult,” Moskowitz says.

“People spend too little time on whether they have the right betas, and too much time on alpha.”

Alpha and beta provide the tools for investors to achieve the goals of a higher reward for lower risk, but investors often get confused in the nomenclature, he says.

Furthermore, the alphas and betas are hard to measure for hedge funds, due to the self-reporting of returns, the illiquid instruments that are used and the lack of transparency.

A way to access this alternative beta, alternative hedge fund risk premia (the common risk factors associated with alternative or hedge fund strategies) is through managed futures.

“Simple managed futures strategies capture a significant portfolio of manager returns,” he says.

Studying the manager and index returns reveals significant exposure to multiple signals.

A way to capture this is to construct simple managed futures strategies across multiple asset classes, and regress the returns of the largest managed futures managers and indexes on the strategies’ returns.

“This applies a systematic quant style to a set of diversified and liquid instruments with trades triggered on trend-following or momentum signals,” he says.

Moskowitz, who also holds a research associate position at the National Bureau of Econoimc Research, is an adviser to AQR, which has $2.4 billion of its $47.5 billion in managed futures.

 

His award-winning papers can be accessed here

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

CheckRisk rethinks the risk business

Beta-driven equity investors may currently be taking far greater risks than they are getting paid for when seeking broad market exposure, British risk expert Nick Bullman warns. Bullman, the founder of specialist risk consultancy CheckRisk, has developed a methodology using macroeconomic research along with econometric and behavioural risk inputs to identify what he describes as

Conservative Korea

Korean corporate pension funds have grown more conservative in their investments, increasing already high allocations to guaranteed-insurance contracts (GICs) and term savings, the Towers Watson Korea Pension Report shows. The annual snapshot of the Korean pension market found that 93 per cent of corporate pension-plan assets are allocated to principal-guaranteed products, of which nearly 58

Report reveals Norway’s SWF climate risk

Norway’s 3496 billion kroner (US$582.7 billion) sovereign wealth fund could suffer significant losses in a range of climate-change scenarios if it fails to hedge its risk by investing in climate-sensitive assets, the release of a confidential report shows. Norway’s Ministry of Finance recently released an extensive study by asset consultant Mercer on the effects of

Risk modelling
requires review

Advocating the use of financial models a six-year-old could understand and warning that the dogmatic belief in overly complex and unrealistic models contributed to the financial crisis were some of the challenging views put to the attendees of the recent CFA Institute’s annual conference. Throwing down the gauntlet was GMO asset-allocation team member James Montier,

Institutional investors fall behind USA Inc

Institutional investors are clearly behind in risk management compared to the innovative techniques implemented in treasury departments of corporate America, chief investment officer of Wurts and Associates, Jeff Scott says. Scott, who spent his career managing the balance sheet at Microsoft, Dow Chemical, the Alaska Permanent Fund and now investment consultant Wurts, says institutional investors

Pipes over promises

The Canadian Pension Plan Investment Board (CPPIB) is shunning European sovereign bonds, with the $152.8-billion fund’s head of investment saying European infrastructure offers far more attractive risk/return opportunities. Mark Wiseman, CPPIB’s executive vice-president of investments, told delegates at last week’s Milken Institute Global Conference 2012 in Los Angeles that the fund had chosen not to

Previous