New decision making parameters for Alaska’s investments

The $38.5 billion Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation (APFC) has made further enhancements to its unique approach to investment decision making, clarifying procedures relating to risk guidelines in its investment policy.

The investment policy outlines via colour codes, different operating zones which allow for various decisions to be made with, or without board approval, and correlate to the riskiness of investments.

There are three zones – green, yellow and red – with the policy outlining that the portfolio must be within the green zone at least 80 per cent of the time. The green zone is the board approved, chief investment officer operating zone.

In December the board expanded the communications and procedures for the riskier zones of yellow and red.

The amended policy clarified each required step to enter into the yellow and red zones, including the steps required to extend operating in the zones. The policy had previously been less clear about extending approval for operating in these zones and the procedures required for notifying those needed to approve it.  The updated policy has also made provisions for the board to be provided with a historical report showing periods of operating within the yellow and red zones at board meetings.

Changes to the APFC investment policy also clarified that any weighting above 20 per cent to a single portfolio manager or investment vehicle within a distressed, mezzanine or credit opportunity mandate must be approved in writing by the executive director upon recommendation of the CIO.

Sponsored Content

Previously the policy did not specify who was required to provide the written approval. The amended policy also removed the restriction on the investment life of general partnerships, increasing the partners’ ability to invest in distressed debt funds. The policy previously limited investment life to December 31, 2022.

These changes follow on from the introduction of a new way of classifying its investments in 2009 and demonstrate APFC’s continual strive to make changes to ensure the fund is well positioned to provide benefits for Alaskans now and in the future.

One response to “New decision making parameters for Alaska’s investments”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

In pursuit of the perfect fee model

Matteo Dante Perruccio and Mark Barker, chief executive and co-chief investment officer of Hermes BPK, the boutique fund of funds majority-owned by Hermes Fund Managers in turn owned by the BT Pension Scheme, speak to Amanda White about the benefits of focusing on investment management, and not asset gathering, in the hedge fund game and

CalPERS to hold public board meetings

CalPERS’ remaining board meetings for the year, in May, July and September, will be open to the public as the fund deliberates a full asset-liability assessment, culminating in a potential change to the benchmark rate of return in December. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

The Netherlands leads charge into government bonds

The Netherlands, an innovator in pension investment management, is leading a renaissance into government bonds at the expense of corporate bonds, as other European countries further reduce their domestic equities allocation, according to Mercer Investment Consulting’s 2010 European asset allocation survey. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Flexible in-house thinking pays dividends for Canada’s HOOPP

A strategic shift into equities during 2009 and the completion of a multi-year strategy to bring all assets in house, has resulted in the Healthcare of Ontario Pension Plan (HOOPP) returning 15.18 per cent return for 2009, positioning it as one of very few pension funds around the globe to be fully funded. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored

Australia’s UniSuper launches first internal capabilities

The $A25 billion ($23 billion) UniSuper will ramp up its internal funds management capabilities, with four of its own portfolios set to be running by the end of the year, in conjunction with a project that will see its defined benefit and defined contribution sections adopt differing investment strategies for the first time. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored

CalSTRS cost breakdown supports internal savings…

A breakdown of CalSTRS’ investment costs confirms the cost savings of internal asset management, with the fund’s internal asset management costs making up only 0.07 per cent of the total portfolio management costs, but comprising 30 per cent of the total assets managed. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Previous