$38b UN fund to review ALM

The investments committee and committee of actuaries of the $38 billion UN Joint Staff Pension Board will recommend the introduction of new asset classes, including emerging markets equity and debt, real return assets and private equity in a presentation to the board in July.

It is the first time the fund will revisit an ALM study which recommends that the inclusion of the new asset classes provided marginal long-term benefits to the plan, regardless of the level of risk tolerance, and so should be considered.

Regardless of the three optional risk tolerance philosophies – of prudent funding, or return-oriented or defensive – the study recommended a 3 per cent allocation to private equity among other asset allocation adjustments. Until this time the fund has not included the new asset classes in its asset allocation.

At the most recent meeting, the investment committee recommends that the Secretary-General study this possibility and report back in due course.

The study, to be formally presented to the Board in July, also included a comprehensive risk tolerance framework which considered eight risk factors to more precisely quantify total plan risks.

At the end of March 2009, the fund was 8 per cent under its long-term equities benchmark of 60 per cent, and overweight bonds (6 per cent) and real estate.

Sponsored Content

It introduced a new benchmark in 2006 which consists of 60 per cent MSCI All Country World Index, 31 per cent Barclays Capital Global Aggregate Bond Index, 6 per cent National Council of Real Estate Investment Fiduciaries Open End Diversified Core Index, and 3 per cent 91-day US Treasury Bill.

At a meeting of the two committees last week, which concluded with lunch with the UN Secretary-General, it was reported the fund was earning good returns and enjoyed a positive actuarial balance with a funding ratio close to 100 per cent.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Investors x embrace ethics

More than half of the world’s largest sovereign wealth funds, and around a third of the largest US state pension funds, have a disclosed code of ethics for their staff. According to the Public Fund Investment Policies 2015 annual review produced by the Ohio State University Moritz College of Law, a code of ethics helps

Shared fund objectives key to investor success

The practice of benchmarking the salaries of senior executives of institutional funds with reference to external financial services firms, instead of the shared objectives of the fund, is a major barrier to their success, according to Professor Gordon Clark of Oxford University and director of Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment. Clark sees the

PGGM halves CO2 footprint in investments

Ahead of the COP21 in Paris, the second largest Dutch fund with €161 billion ($160 billion), Pensioenfonds Zorg en Welzijn (PFZW), has announced it will halve the CO2 footprint of its investments by 2020. After an in-depth study with its fund manager, PGGM, the fund has decided its capital should be focused on companies that

Mercer’s seven tools for risk management reflect evolving landscape

Mercer Investments is using its deep insurance and environmental, social and governance (ESG) skills, contacts and processes to evolve its tools for advising clients on investment risk assessment, analysis and reporting – a move that reflects the evolving landscape for risk faced by investors. Partner and global head of responsible investment at Mercer, Jane Ambachtsheer,

OTPP advises on climate risk mitigation

Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan (OTPP), an investor known for its advanced risk-management tools and processes, considers that the common tools available to investors to mitigate carbon risk for investors – portfolio carbon footprints and thematic divestment – provide incomplete risk management. The fund has suggested macro- and microanalysis is necessary to understand a company’s complete

PRI to consider new principle focusing on systemic risks

The UN-backed Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) is considering a seventh principle that will focus on broad financial system systemic risks. The six principles were written before the global financial crisis and are focused on environmental, social and governance (ESG) integration. Now, a decade after their creation, consideration of systemic risks is on the agenda and

Previous