$100b mismatch in private equity secondaries demand and supply

Recessions are traditionally considered a good time to invest in private equity, but liquidity constraints and the growth of unlisted assets within portfolios is causing pension funds to sit on the sideline. Sally Collier, London-based partner at global private equity fund of funds Pantheon Ventures, said there was a US$100 billion “mismatch” between the funds available for investment in the secondaries market and the “tidal wave of supply”.

The fall in prices and more moderation in leverage structures should present good opportunities for investment going forward, Collier said.

While the $174 billion CalPERS and the $36.9 billion Harvard University endowment have been among the sellers of private equity during the financial crisis, Collier said most institutional investors were maintaining their allocations.

The level of capital calls was not very high because investments were not being made at a high rate, she added.

“The beauty of private equity is it’s a cash return,” Collier said. “We don’t see so many pension funds selling.”

She described the secondaries market as a “buyers’ market” but warned pension funds to be tread carefully due to the wide dispersion of returns available.

Sponsored Content

“The return variability [of private equity] is nine times the public markets. In times of difficulty that dispersion probably widens,” she said.

“That’s exactly what we are seeing at the moment – therefore the premium for getting it right is even stronger.”

Anna Hocking, senior manager, investor services Australia at Russell Investments, said many Australian super funds had recognised the opportunities for investment in the private equity market but were “not necessarily able to take advantage of them because of liquidity and the denominator effect”.

The denominator effect describes the rise in unlisted assets within pension portfolios as the value of listed assets falls.

CalPERS sold off around $2.1 billion in fund interests in a number of secondary transactions starting in the third quarter of 2007 and finishing in August 2008.

Harvard, which manages the largest US endowment, put around $1.5 billion of stakes in private equity funds on the market in 2007.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

As themes take hold: the trick is not to pay too much

Thematic investment strategies are easy enough to understand but not so easy to implement. The curse of the thematic manager is the curse of overpaying.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Demographic problem mostly about haves and have-nots

The demographics driving the funds management industry, of ageing populations almost everywhere, are more complicated than you think. Greg Bright spoke to the Asia Pacific leader for Towers Watson, Bob Charles, who is a demographics expert, about the real demographic problems facing the world.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Equities lose out to bonds for Europe’s sustainable investors

Bonds are the favoured asset class at 53 per cent among European sustainable and responsible investors with equities dropping to 33 per cent, according to a Eurosif SRI report.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Tail risk hedging should be part of broader strategy

With bond yields at historic lows, particularly in the US, pension funds have been searching for new forms of downside protection to reduce tail risk, boosting demand for certain types of hedge funds in the process. In the US, too, where demand is invariably met by a quick supply of new products, specialist ‘tail-risk funds’

Endowment funds turn to alternatives

Foundation and endowment funds are allocating the largest percentage of alternatives to their portfolios, with public funds coming second ahead corporate plans in third place.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

The case for a new look at global benchmarks

Indexes are important for pension funds. They benchmark the fund’s performance against goals and peers. They allow the fund’s managers to be measured and often times they decide the managers’ remuneration. You would think, then, that there must be a lot of science behind their use.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Previous