USS outlines new climate scenarios for improved investment decision-making

The UK’s Universities Superannuation Scheme has produced new climate scenarios that are more informative for investors by focusing on shorter-term scenarios and switching the focus from temperature pathways to the complex interplay of physical and human factors.

The £75.5 billion fund aims to develop a long-term investment outlook informed by the scenarios and draw out investment implications for capital markets expectations, top-down portfolio construction, and country/sector preferences.

USS commissioned the University of Exeter earlier this year to apply a new approach to scenarios to support its investment and risk management decision making. The result of that collaboration is a report released today No Time To Lose – New Scenario Narratives for Action on Climate Change, which introduces four new climate scenarios that look at shorter-term and more realistic time horizons to inform investment decision making.

The new scenarios are more meaningful for investors because they switch the focus away from global average temperature pathways and towards the complex interplay between physical factors such as extreme weather events and human factors such as disruptions in geopolitics, economics, financial markets, and technology.

The focus is on operationalising net zero commitments and the need to have shorter term and bespoke scenarios to achieve that.

“This paradigm shift towards shorter horizons and business applications requires scenarios that focus less on the climate itself and more on the vicissitudes of politics, markets and extreme weather events. Global warming is not a major uncertainty over the next few years, but extreme weather events are rising rapidly, even if location and timing are uncertain,” the report says.

Sponsored Content

The report highlights that existing scenarios understate both the economic damage of climate change and the potential benefits of action, failing to capture key aspects of the real world, and so restrict their usefulness for investment decision-making. It also recognises that the mainstream economic models being used for climate risk scenarios are not up to this task.

Mirko Cardinale, head of investment strategy and advice at USS Investment Management, says the fund wants to lead in the development of this new approach that is focused on understanding how real-world dynamics could play out.

“The work with the University of Exeter has been extremely valuable in representing an important milestone for the development of a new approach to climate scenario analysis,” he says.

“We aim to lead in the development of this new approach that is less focused on precise estimation and more on understanding how real-world dynamics could play out in a complex world where climate risks cannot be looked at in isolation from political, economic, and technological factors. Moving forward, we intend to develop a long-term investment outlook informed by the scenarios and draw out investment implications for capital markets expectations, top-down portfolio construction, and country/sector preferences.”

USS’s Mirko Cardindale and University of Exeter Visiting Fellow Mike Clark will speak at the Sustainability in Practice event at Oxford University from November 6-8. For the program and more information click here.

Leave a Comment

La Caisse’s oil exit pays off as renewables portfolio pulls ahead of fossil fuels

La Caisse’s oil exit pays off as renewables portfolio pulls ahead of fossil fuels

Divesting from the oil sector has been a boon for La Caisse’s performance, as the Canadian pension giant says its energy investments have earned billions in value-add compared to the benchmark since the inception of its climate strategy. Head of sustainability Bertrand Millot unpacks the fund’s approach in an interview with Top1000funds.com.

Sort content by

Phase down or phase-out: Is there a difference?

The “phase out” or “phase down” of coal use leads us down two different paths with the Thinkin Ahead’s Tim Hodgson arguing that phase out is a choice to save the planet, while phase down is an attempt to save our unsustainable way of life.

Utah Retirement Systems: Why ESG is a waste of time

Divestment doesn't work, scope 3 reporting will tie companies in regulatory knots and ESG integration threatens pension funds long term returns and their ability to finance the transition. Utah Retirement Systems' John Skjervem says the only way to solve the climate emergency is to keep investing in fossil fuels.

Active, in-house and sustainability: The driving factors at AP3

AP3’s ability to actively benefit from volatile markets is rooted in a reform process undertaken by CIO Pablo Bernengo, replacing decade-old, separate alpha and beta allocations with a traditional asset class structures but avoiding silos. Active risk and sustainability go hand in hand, he says, and is a 2023 focus.

NZ Super culls equities, focuses on impact

New Zealand Super has radically slashed the holdings in its passive equities portfolio as it re-aligns the portfolio with a Paris-aligned benchmark. It’s part of the fund’s shift to a sustainable finance focus which includes improving the fund’s already-good ESG profile and a more long-term future focus on impact investing.

Railpen lays out 2023 voting policies; mental health a priority

Railpen lists climate, cyber security and mental health in the workplace amongst its key engagement and AGM voting priorities in 2023.

Mandates need innovating to encompass sustainable investing

The credibility of transition plans is under scrutiny because while sustainable investing is booming real world impact is going in the wrong direction. In response investors need to innovate on the nature of investment mandates says Colin le Duc, a founding partner of Generation.

Previous